Kim Oh Seok, Newell Joshua P
Geography Doctoral Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA;
School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
J Land Use Sci. 2015 Oct 1;10(4):466-489. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2014.947640. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
This paper proposes a new land-change model, the Geographic Emission Benchmark (GEB), as an approach to quantify land-cover changes associated with deforestation and forest degradation. The GEB is designed to determine 'baseline' activity data for reference levels. Unlike other models that forecast business-as-usual future deforestation, the GEB internally (1) characterizes 'forest' and 'deforestation' with minimal processing and ground-truthing and (2) identifies 'deforestation hotspots' using open-source spatial methods to estimate regional rates of deforestation. The GEB also characterizes forest degradation and identifies leakage belts. This paper compares the accuracy of GEB with GEOMOD, a popular land-change model used in the UN-REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) Program. Using a case study of the Chinese tropics for comparison, GEB's projection is more accurate than GEOMOD's, as measured by Figure of Merit. Thus, the GEB produces baseline activity data that are moderately accurate for the setting of reference levels.
本文提出了一种新的土地变化模型——地理排放基准(GEB),作为一种量化与森林砍伐和森林退化相关的土地覆盖变化的方法。GEB旨在确定参考水平的“基线”活动数据。与其他预测照常进行的未来森林砍伐的模型不同,GEB在内部(1)以最少的处理和地面实况调查来表征“森林”和“森林砍伐”,并且(2)使用开源空间方法识别“森林砍伐热点地区”,以估计区域森林砍伐率。GEB还表征森林退化并识别泄漏带。本文将GEB的准确性与GEOMOD(联合国减少毁林和森林退化所致排放量(REDD)计划中使用的一种常用土地变化模型)进行了比较。通过以中国热带地区为例进行比较,根据品质因数衡量,GEB的预测比GEOMOD更准确。因此,GEB生成的基线活动数据对于设定参考水平具有适度的准确性。