Yadav N, Kumar S, Marlowe T, Chaudhary A K, Kumar R, Wang J, O'Malley J, Boland P M, Jayanthi S, Kumar T K S, Yadava N, Chandra D
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Cell Death Dis. 2015 Nov 5;6(11):e1969. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.305.
Cancer cells tend to develop resistance to various types of anticancer agents, whether they adopt similar or distinct mechanisms to evade cell death in response to a broad spectrum of cancer therapeutics is not fully defined. Current study concludes that DNA-damaging agents (etoposide and doxorubicin), ER stressor (thapsigargin), and histone deacetylase inhibitor (apicidin) target oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for apoptosis induction, whereas other anticancer agents including staurosporine, taxol, and sorafenib induce apoptosis in an OXPHOS-independent manner. DNA-damaging agents promoted mitochondrial biogenesis accompanied by increased accumulation of cellular and mitochondrial ROS, mitochondrial protein-folding machinery, and mitochondrial unfolded protein response. Induction of mitochondrial biogenesis occurred in a caspase activation-independent mechanism but was reduced by autophagy inhibition and p53-deficiency. Abrogation of complex-I blocked DNA-damage-induced caspase activation and apoptosis, whereas inhibition of complex-II or a combined deficiency of OXPHOS complexes I, III, IV, and V due to impaired mitochondrial protein synthesis did not modulate caspase activity. Mechanistic analysis revealed that inhibition of caspase activation in response to anticancer agents associates with decreased release of mitochondrial cytochrome c in complex-I-deficient cells compared with wild type (WT) cells. Gross OXPHOS deficiencies promoted increased release of apoptosis-inducing factor from mitochondria compared with WT or complex-I-deficient cells, suggesting that cells harboring defective OXPHOS trigger caspase-dependent as well as caspase-independent apoptosis in response to anticancer agents. Interestingly, DNA-damaging agent doxorubicin showed strong binding to mitochondria, which was disrupted by complex-I-deficiency but not by complex-II-deficiency. Thapsigargin-induced caspase activation was reduced upon abrogation of complex-I or gross OXPHOS deficiency whereas a reverse trend was observed with apicidin. Together, these finding provide a new strategy for differential mitochondrial targeting in cancer therapy.
癌细胞往往会对各种类型的抗癌药物产生耐药性,目前尚不完全清楚它们在面对广泛的癌症治疗方法时,是采用相似还是不同的机制来逃避细胞死亡。当前研究得出结论,DNA损伤剂(依托泊苷和阿霉素)、内质网应激剂(毒胡萝卜素)和组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂(阿皮西丁)通过靶向氧化磷酸化(OXPHOS)来诱导细胞凋亡,而其他抗癌药物,包括星形孢菌素、紫杉醇和索拉非尼,则以不依赖OXPHOS的方式诱导细胞凋亡。DNA损伤剂促进线粒体生物发生,同时细胞和线粒体活性氧、线粒体蛋白质折叠机制以及线粒体未折叠蛋白反应的积累增加。线粒体生物发生的诱导通过一种不依赖半胱天冬酶激活的机制发生,但会因自噬抑制和p53缺陷而减少。复合体I的缺失阻断了DNA损伤诱导的半胱天冬酶激活和细胞凋亡,而复合体II的抑制或由于线粒体蛋白质合成受损导致的OXPHOS复合体I、III、IV和V的联合缺陷并未调节半胱天冬酶活性。机制分析表明,与野生型(WT)细胞相比,复合体I缺陷细胞中,抗癌药物诱导的半胱天冬酶激活的抑制与线粒体细胞色素c释放减少有关。与WT或复合体I缺陷细胞相比,严重的OXPHOS缺陷促进了凋亡诱导因子从线粒体的释放增加,这表明OXPHOS有缺陷的细胞在面对抗癌药物时会触发依赖半胱天冬酶和不依赖半胱天冬酶的细胞凋亡。有趣的是,DNA损伤剂阿霉素与线粒体有很强的结合,这种结合因复合体I缺陷而被破坏,但不因复合体II缺陷而被破坏。复合体I缺失或严重的OXPHOS缺陷会降低毒胡萝卜素诱导的半胱天冬酶激活,而阿皮西丁则观察到相反的趋势。总之,这些发现为癌症治疗中差异线粒体靶向提供了一种新策略。