Silva-Velazco Jorge, Stocchi Luca, Costedio Meagan, Gorgun Emre, Kessler Hermann, Remzi Feza H
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/A30, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3541-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4651-6. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis is widely accepted, using either endolinear staplers or traditional linear staplers under direct vision through the extraction site to transect the rectum. The aim of this study was to assess modifiable factors affecting perioperative morbidity after elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis.
Potential associations between perioperative morbidity and demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related factors were assessed on all consecutive patients included in a prospectively collected database undergoing elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis between 1992 and 2013. Rectal transection with a linear stapler under direct vision through the extraction site was considered compatible with laparoscopic technique.
There were two deaths out of 1059 patients (0.19 %). Conversion rate was 13.1 %, overall morbidity 28 %, and anastomotic leak 3.7 %. Independent factors associated with morbidity in an intent-to-treat analysis were ASA 3 (OR 1.53, p = 0.006), conversion (OR 1.71, p = 0.015), and rectal transection without endolinear stapling (traditional linear stapler: OR 1.75, p = 0.003; surgical knife: OR 2.09, p = 0.002). The same factors along with complicated diverticulitis (OR 1.56, p = 0.013) were independently associated with overall morbidity among laparoscopically completed cases. BMI ≥ 35 (OR 2.3, p = 0.017), complicated diverticulitis (OR 2.37, p = 0.002), and rectal transection with a traditional linear stapler (OR 2.19, p = 0.018) were independently associated with abdomino-pelvic infections, both in an intent-to-treat analysis and among laparoscopically completed cases. The number of endolinear stapler firings was not associated with morbidity.
Most factors associated with morbidity of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis cannot be easily modified. With the limitation of a retrospective analysis, modifiable factors to minimize morbidity are laparoscopic completion and endolinear stapling.
腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎已被广泛接受,可使用腔内直线切割吻合器或传统直线切割吻合器在直视下经取出部位横断直肠。本研究旨在评估择期腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎后影响围手术期发病率的可改变因素。
对1992年至2013年间前瞻性收集的数据库中所有接受择期腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎的连续患者,评估围手术期发病率与人口统计学、疾病相关及治疗相关因素之间的潜在关联。经取出部位直视下用直线切割吻合器横断直肠被认为与腹腔镜技术相符。
1059例患者中有2例死亡(0.19%)。中转率为13.1%,总体发病率为28%,吻合口漏发生率为3.7%。意向性分析中与发病率相关的独立因素为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级3级(比值比[OR]1.53,p = 0.006)、中转(OR 1.71,p = 0.015)以及未使用腔内直线切割吻合器进行直肠横断(传统直线切割吻合器:OR 1.75,p = 0.003;手术刀:OR 2.09,p = 0.002)。在腹腔镜完成的病例中,相同因素以及复杂性憩室炎(OR 1.56,p = 0.013)与总体发病率独立相关。体重指数(BMI)≥35(OR 2.3,p = 0.017)、复杂性憩室炎(OR 2.37,p = 0.002)以及使用传统直线切割吻合器进行直肠横断(OR 2.19,p = 0.018)在意向性分析和腹腔镜完成的病例中均与腹盆腔感染独立相关。腔内直线切割吻合器的击发次数与发病率无关。
大多数与腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎发病率相关的因素不易改变。鉴于回顾性分析的局限性,将发病率降至最低的可改变因素为腹腔镜完成手术和使用腔内直线切割吻合器。