Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜低位前切除联合DST吻合术后吻合口漏的危险因素。

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis.

作者信息

Kawada Kenji, Hasegawa Suguru, Hida Koya, Hirai Kenjiro, Okoshi Kae, Nomura Akinari, Kawamura Junichiro, Nagayama Satoshi, Sakai Yoshiharu

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2988-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3564-0. Epub 2014 May 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic rectal surgery involving rectal transection and anastomosis with stapling devices is technically difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) with double-stapling technique (DST) anastomosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-institution study of 154 rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR with DST anastomosis between June 2005 and August 2013. Patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. The outcome of interest was clinical AL.

RESULTS

The overall AL rate was 12.3% (19/154). In univariate analysis, tumor size (P = 0.001), operative time (P = 0.049), intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.037), lateral lymph node dissection (P = 0.009), multiple firings of the linear stapler (P = 0.041), and precompression before stapler firings (P = 0.008) were significantly associated with AL. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size (odds ratio [OR] 4.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-12.89; P = 0.02) and precompression before stapler firings (OR 4.58; CI 1.22-17.20; P = 0.024) as independent risk factors for AL. In particular, precompression before stapler firing tended to reduce the AL occurring in early postoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Using appropriate techniques, laparoscopic LAR with DST anastomosis can be performed safely without increasing the risk of AL. Important risk factors for AL were tumor size and precompression before stapler firings.

摘要

背景

涉及直肠横断和使用吻合器进行吻合的腹腔镜直肠手术技术难度较大。本研究旨在评估采用双吻合器技术(DST)行腹腔镜低位前切除术(LAR)后吻合口漏(AL)的危险因素。

方法

这是一项在单一机构进行的回顾性研究,纳入了2005年6月至2013年8月间154例行腹腔镜LAR并采用DST吻合术的直肠癌患者。通过单因素和多因素分析对患者、肿瘤及手术相关变量进行研究。感兴趣的结局为临床吻合口漏。

结果

总体吻合口漏发生率为12.3%(19/154)。单因素分析显示,肿瘤大小(P = 0.001)、手术时间(P = 0.049)、术中出血(P = 0.037)、侧方淋巴结清扫(P = 0.009)、直线吻合器多次击发(P = 0.041)以及吻合器击发前预压迫(P = 0.008)与吻合口漏显著相关。多因素分析确定肿瘤大小(比值比[OR] 4.01;95%置信区间[CI] 1.25 - 12.89;P = 0.02)和吻合器击发前预压迫(OR 4.58;CI 1.22 - 17.20;P = 0.024)为吻合口漏的独立危险因素。特别是,吻合器击发前预压迫倾向于减少术后早期发生的吻合口漏。

结论

采用适当技术,腹腔镜LAR联合DST吻合术可安全实施,且不增加吻合口漏风险。吻合口漏的重要危险因素为肿瘤大小和吻合器击发前预压迫。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis.
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2988-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3564-0. Epub 2014 May 23.
5
Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Sep;24(9):919-925. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02240-7. Epub 2020 May 25.
6
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection: A single-center retrospective study.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):478-488. doi: 10.1111/ases.12900. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Meta-analysis of Powered Circular Stapler Manual Circular Stapler for Colorectal Anastomosis.
In Vivo. 2025 Jul-Aug;39(4):2165-2175. doi: 10.21873/invivo.14012.
3
The Review of Modified Intersphincteric Resection in the Treatment of Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Feb;26(2):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01291-y. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
4
New double-stapling technique without staple-crossing line in laparoscopic low anterior resection: effort to reduce anastomotic leakage.
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Dec;40(6):573-579. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.00409.0058. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
[Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery].
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;95(11):878-886. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02180-0. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
6
[Predictability of anastomotic leaks in visceral surgery].
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;95(11):901-905. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02175-x. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
8
Anastomotic tension "Bridging": a risk factor for anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4916-4925. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11008-1. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
9
Role of body mass index in anastomotic leakage after curative treatment for rectal cancer.
Ann Saudi Med. 2024 May-Jun;44(3):135-140. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.135. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
10
A nomogram of anastomotic stricture after rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3661-3671. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10885-w. Epub 2024 May 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Efficacy of transanal drainage for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection of the rectum.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 May;6(2):90-5. doi: 10.1111/ases.12010. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
4
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
JAMA Surg. 2013 Jan;148(1):65-71. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2.
6
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using a stapling technique.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Jun;22(3):239-43. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824fbb56.
10
The importance of precompression time for secure stapling with a linear stapler.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2382-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1527-7. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验