Ha Kyoo-Man, Park Sosoon, Yoon Yi, Nam Ki-Hun, Oh Hyeon-Mun
Department of Emergency Management, Inje University, 197 Inje-ro, Gimhae, 50834 Korea.
National Disaster Management Institute, 6/13F, 136 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul, 04212 Korea.
Springerplus. 2015 Oct 29;4:653. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1459-8. eCollection 2015.
This article aims to encourage NEMA (or newly named as MPSS) to combine its supply-centered paradigm with a newly proposed "demand-centered paradigm" in the Korean field of emergency management training (EMT). Based on qualitative content analysis, this paper defined the current field of EMT to be a supply-centered paradigm via three components: locations, courses, and participants. This paradigm focuses on EMT provision as supplied and dictated by the national government. On the other hand, a demand-centered model is about looking into stakeholders' actual needs for EMT. In this regard, alternatives with reference to the demand-centered paradigm via the same three components were discussed and considered. The key tenet is that having revealed that NEMA has unequivocally focused on the results side or effectiveness of EMT via a supply-centered paradigm, Korea should address and consider the same three components, this time by fusing and incorporating a fair process of EMT by enlisting active roles from the local community, academic scholars, and civilian training attendees in a demand-centered paradigm.
本文旨在鼓励韩国紧急管理培训（EMT）领域的国家应急管理机构（NEMA，或新命名为MPSS）将其以供应为中心的模式与新提出的“以需求为中心的模式”相结合。基于定性内容分析，本文通过地点、课程和参与者这三个要素，将当前的EMT领域定义为以供应为中心的模式。这种模式侧重于由国家政府提供并规定的EMT培训。另一方面，以需求为中心的模式则关注利益相关者对EMT的实际需求。在这方面，本文通过相同的三个要素，讨论并考虑了以需求为中心模式的替代方案。关键原则是，既然已经揭示出NEMA通过以供应为中心的模式明确关注EMT的结果或有效性，韩国就应该通过在以需求为中心的模式中，争取当地社区、学术学者和民间培训参与者的积极参与，融合并纳入公平的EMT流程，再次审视并考虑这三个要素。
