• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

To RCT or not to RCT? The ongoing saga of randomised trials in quality improvement.

作者信息

Parry Gareth, Power Maxine

机构信息

Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):221-3. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004862. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004862
PMID:26545704
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
To RCT or not to RCT? The ongoing saga of randomised trials in quality improvement.进行随机对照试验还是不进行？质量改进中随机试验的持续故事。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):221-3. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004862. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
2
Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.随机对照试验摘要的质量自 CONSORT 报告规范发布后是否有所提高？对四本知名麻醉学期刊的调查。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jul;28(7):485-92. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833fb96f.
3
A case report of evaluating a large-scale health systems improvement project in an uncontrolled setting: a quality improvement initiative in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.在非受控环境中评估大规模卫生系统改进项目的病例报告：南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的一项质量改进举措
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):891-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001244. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
4
Trials of Intervention Principles: Evaluation Methods for Evolving Behavioral Intervention Technologies.干预原则试验：不断发展的行为干预技术的评估方法
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 8;17(7):e166. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4391.
5
[Assessment of the quality of clinical therapeutic research published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics].《对发表于<中华儿科杂志>的临床治疗性研究质量的评估》
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;51(1):29-33.
6
Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦一项随机对照试验中综合数据质量保证方案的实施与结果
Trials. 2017 Sep 7;18(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2159-1.
7
Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines.肿瘤学试验摘要显示报告方面的改善未达最佳水平：一项使用CONSORT摘要指南进行的前后对比评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):658-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.012. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
8
Methodological and ethical quality in phase III--breast cancer trials.III期乳腺癌试验的方法学与伦理质量
Med Law. 2009 Dec;28(4):637-48.
9
Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials comparing short-term results of laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resection.比较腹腔镜与传统结直肠切除术短期结果的随机对照试验的方法学质量
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;22(11):1369-76. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0318-7. Epub 2007 May 26.
10
Is a controlled randomised trial the non-plus-ultra design? A contribution to discussion on comparative, controlled, non-randomised trials.是对照随机试验设计的极致吗？——对对照、非随机试验的讨论的贡献。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 May;35(1):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Contribution of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): What Can Eye Health Can Learn From Commercial Industry and Early Lessons From the Application of Machine Learning in Eye Health Programmes.人工智能在实现可持续发展目标方面的贡献：从商业行业和机器学习在眼健康计划中的应用早期经验中学到什么。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 22;9:752049. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.752049. eCollection 2021.
2
Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation.一项减轻医护人员心理困扰的团体干预措施的效果：一项前后对照的准实验性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 27;21(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06413-4.
3
Coproduction for feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trials: learning outcomes for community partners, service users and the research team.
可行性和试点随机对照试验的共同生产：社区合作伙伴、服务使用者和研究团队的学习成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Oct 8;4:32. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0116-0. eCollection 2018.
4
How did they do that?他们是怎么做到的？
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Dec 3;6(2):e000255. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000255. eCollection 2017.
5
The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: what works, for whom and in what setting? Protocol for a realist review.语境因素对医疗质量改进措施的影响：什么有效、对谁有效以及在什么环境下有效？一项真实审查研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;6(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0566-8.
6
Implementation science: Relevance in the real world without sacrificing rigor.实施科学：在不牺牲严谨性的前提下与现实世界的相关性。
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 25;14(4):e1002288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002288. eCollection 2017 Apr.
7
An assessment of factors associated with quality of randomized controlled trials for smoking cessation.一项关于戒烟随机对照试验质量相关因素的评估。
Oncotarget. 2016 Aug 16;7(33):53762-53771. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10742.