University of Alabama at Birmingham.
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon, and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1-26. doi: 10.1002/art.39480. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
To develop a new evidence-based, pharmacologic treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
We conducted systematic reviews to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of various treatment options. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence. We employed a group consensus process to grade the strength of recommendations (either strong or conditional). A strong recommendation indicates that clinicians are certain that the benefits of an intervention far outweigh the harms (or vice versa). A conditional recommendation denotes uncertainty over the balance of benefits and harms and/or more significant variability in patient values and preferences.
The guideline covers the use of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in early (<6 months) and established (≥6 months) RA. In addition, it provides recommendations on using a treat-to-target approach, tapering and discontinuing medications, and the use of biologic agents and DMARDs in patients with hepatitis, congestive heart failure, malignancy, and serious infections. The guideline addresses the use of vaccines in patients starting/receiving DMARDs or biologic agents, screening for tuberculosis in patients starting/receiving biologic agents or tofacitinib, and laboratory monitoring for traditional DMARDs. The guideline includes 74 recommendations: 23% are strong and 77% are conditional.
This RA guideline should serve as a tool for clinicians and patients (our two target audiences) for pharmacologic treatment decisions in commonly encountered clinical situations. These recommendations are not prescriptive, and the treatment decisions should be made by physicians and patients through a shared decision-making process taking into account patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.
制定新的基于证据的类风湿关节炎(RA)药物治疗指南。
我们进行了系统评价,以综合各种治疗选择的获益和风险证据。我们使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法来评估证据质量。我们采用小组共识流程来分级推荐强度(强或有条件)。强推荐表示临床医生确定干预措施的获益远远超过危害(反之亦然)。有条件推荐表示获益和危害之间的平衡存在不确定性,或者患者价值观和偏好存在更大的差异。
该指南涵盖了传统疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)、生物制剂、托法替布和糖皮质激素在早期(<6 个月)和已确立(≥6 个月)RA 中的应用。此外,它还提供了关于使用靶向治疗方法、逐渐减少和停止药物治疗以及在患有肝炎、充血性心力衰竭、恶性肿瘤和严重感染的患者中使用生物制剂和 DMARDs 的建议。该指南还涉及在开始/接受 DMARDs 或生物制剂的患者中使用疫苗、在开始/接受生物制剂或托法替布的患者中筛查结核病以及对传统 DMARDs 进行实验室监测的建议。该指南包含 74 条建议:23%为强推荐,77%为有条件推荐。
该 RA 指南应作为临床医生和患者(我们的两个目标受众)在常见临床情况下进行药物治疗决策的工具。这些建议不是规定性的,治疗决策应由医生和患者通过共同决策过程做出,同时考虑患者的价值观、偏好和合并症。这些建议不应被用来限制或拒绝治疗方法。