Zhang Hongmao, Yan Chuan, Chang Gang, Zhang Zhibin
Animal Behaviour Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, Hubei, China.
State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Oecologia. 2016 Feb;180(2):475-84. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3490-4. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
As mutualists, seed dispersers may significantly affect mutualistic interactions and seedling recruitment of sympatric plants that share similar seed dispersers, but studies are rare. Here, we compared seed dispersal fitness in two co-occurring plant species (Armeniaca sibirica and Amygdalus davidiana) that inhabit warm temperate deciduous forest in northern China. We tested the hypothesis that seed trait-mediated selection by rodents may influence mutualistic interactions with rodents and then seedling establishment of co-occurring plant species. A. davidiana seeds are larger and harder (thick endocarps) than A. sibirica seeds, but they have similar levels of nutrients (crude fat, crude protein), caloric value and tannin. More A. sibirica seedlings are found in the field. Semi-natural enclosure tests indicated that the two seed species were both harvested by the same six rodent species, but that A. sibirica had mutualistic interactions (scatter hoarding) with four rodent species (Apodemus peninsulae, A. agrarius, Sciurotamias davidianus, Tamias sibiricus), and A. davidiana with only one (S. davidianus). Tagged seed dispersal experiments in the field indicated that more A. sibirica seeds were scatter-hoarded by rodents, and more A. sibirica seeds survived to the next spring and became seedlings. A. sibirica seeds derive more benefit from seed dispersal by rodents than A. davidiana seeds, particularly in years with limited seed dispersers, which well explained the higher seedling recruitment of A. sibirica compared with that of A. davidiana under natural conditions. Our results suggest that seed dispersers may play a significant role in seedling recruitment and indirect competition between co-occurring plant species.
作为互利共生者,种子传播者可能会显著影响共享相似种子传播者的同域植物的互利共生相互作用和幼苗招募,但相关研究很少。在这里,我们比较了中国北方暖温带落叶林中两种共生植物(山杏和山桃)的种子传播适合度。我们检验了这样一个假设:啮齿动物对种子性状介导的选择可能会影响与啮齿动物的互利共生相互作用,进而影响共生植物物种的幼苗建立。山桃种子比山杏种子更大、更硬(内果皮厚),但它们的营养成分(粗脂肪、粗蛋白)、热值和单宁含量水平相似。在野外发现的山杏幼苗更多。半自然围栏试验表明,这两种种子都被相同的六种啮齿动物采集,但山杏与四种啮齿动物(半岛姬鼠、黑线姬鼠、中华姬鼠、西伯利亚花鼠)存在互利共生相互作用(分散贮藏),而山桃只与一种(中华姬鼠)存在这种相互作用。野外标记种子传播实验表明,啮齿动物对山杏种子的分散贮藏更多,更多的山杏种子存活到次年春天并长成幼苗。与山桃种子相比,山杏种子从啮齿动物传播种子中获得的益处更多,特别是在种子传播者有限的年份,这很好地解释了在自然条件下,山杏的幼苗招募比山桃更高。我们的结果表明,种子传播者可能在共生植物物种的幼苗招募和间接竞争中发挥重要作用。