Escaron Anne L, Martinez-Donate Ana P, Riggall Ann Josie, Meinen Amy, Hall Beverly, Nieto F Javier, Nitzke Susan
AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Health Promot Pract. 2016 Mar;17(2):265-77. doi: 10.1177/1524839915612742. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
Restaurants and food stores are suitable settings for healthy eating interventions. A community-academic partnership developed and implemented "Waupaca Eating Smart" (WES), a healthy eating program in restaurants and supermarkets of a rural, Midwest community. Previous interventions targeted either restaurants or small food stores nearly all in urban areas. Intervention design and implementation is rarely documented, making replication difficult for interested researchers and communities. In this article, we report the activities we undertook to develop and implement WES.
Working with a local nutrition and activity coalition, we used evidence-based strategies guided by the social ecological model and social marketing principles to inform the content of WES. Formative assessment included a review of the literature, statewide key informant interviews and focus groups with restaurant and food store operators and patrons, a local community survey, and interviews with prospective WES businesses. WES was implemented in seven restaurants and two supermarkets and evaluated for feasibility and acceptance using surveys and direct observation of WES implementation.
Prior to this intervention, only one of seven restaurants had three or more meals that met WES nutrition criteria. By the end of the program, 38 meals were labeled and promoted to restaurant customers, and the team had staffed four side salad taste tests for supermarket customers. Four and 10 months after intervention launch, the majority of the program's strategies were observed in participating outlets, suggesting that these program's strategies are feasible and can be sustained. Operators reported strong satisfaction overall.
A combined restaurant- and supermarket-based healthy eating intervention is feasible and positively valued in rural communities. Further research is needed to better understand how to foster sustainability of these interventions and their impact on customer food choices.
餐厅和食品店是开展健康饮食干预的合适场所。一个社区与学术机构的合作项目开发并实施了“沃帕卡明智饮食”(WES),这是一项针对美国中西部一个农村社区的餐厅和超市的健康饮食计划。以往的干预措施几乎都只针对城市地区的餐厅或小型食品店。干预措施的设计和实施很少有记录,这使得感兴趣的研究人员和社区难以进行复制。在本文中,我们报告了为开发和实施WES所开展的活动。
我们与当地的营养与活动联盟合作,采用基于社会生态模型和社会营销原则的循证策略来确定WES的内容。形成性评估包括文献综述、全州范围的关键信息提供者访谈以及与餐厅和食品店经营者及顾客的焦点小组讨论、当地社区调查,以及对潜在的WES商家进行访谈。WES在七家餐厅和两家超市实施,并通过调查和对WES实施情况的直接观察来评估其可行性和接受度。
在此次干预之前,七家餐厅中只有一家有三道或更多符合WES营养标准的菜品。到项目结束时,有38道菜品被贴上标签并向餐厅顾客进行推广,并且该团队为超市顾客组织了四次配菜沙拉试吃活动。在干预启动后的四个月和十个月,在参与项目的门店中观察到该项目的大多数策略,这表明这些项目策略是可行的并且可以持续。经营者总体上表示非常满意。
基于餐厅和超市相结合的健康饮食干预在农村社区是可行的且受到积极评价。需要进一步开展研究,以更好地了解如何促进这些干预措施的可持续性及其对顾客食物选择的影响。