Kachooei Amir Reza, Rivlin Michael, Shojaie Babak, van Dijk C Niek, Mudgal Chaitanya
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Hand and Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Dec;40(12):2372-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.08.030. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
To introduce a technique for the diagnosis of interosseous ligament (IOL) disruption based on lateral displacement of the radius after radial head resection and to determine the cutoff value of the lateral displacement for the diagnosis of disruption, the best elbow position for testing, and the diagnostic performance of the technique in different positions.
We used 10 fresh-frozen cadavers. After resection of the radial head, a Steinman pin was placed into the radius medullary canal and used to mark the pin location on the capitellum. We applied 1 kg force to pull the proximal radius laterally and measured the displacement in full supination, neutral, and full pronation of the forearm with the elbow in extension and then in 90° flexion. All measurements were performed once with the IOL intact and again with it cut. To assess diagnostic efficacy, receiver operating characteristics curves were constructed. To determine the quality of the technique, we measured the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for each position. We also determined the cutoff value to obtain the highest sensitivity and specificity.
The area under the curve of the test in extension-supination and flexion-supination showed that these positions were excellent for the diagnosis of IOL disruption. The cutoff value of 5.5 mm lateral displacement in extension-supination had 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity. In flexion-supination, the cutoff value of 9 mm had 100% sensitivity and 90% specificity for the diagnosis of IOL disruption.
This maneuver was reliable and accurate in cadavers with complete IOL disruption. It is likely that in an intraoperative setting, these results will be reproducible.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.
介绍一种基于桡骨头切除术后桡骨侧向移位诊断骨间韧带(IOL)断裂的技术,并确定用于诊断断裂的侧向移位临界值、最佳测试时的肘部位置以及该技术在不同位置的诊断性能。
我们使用了10具新鲜冷冻尸体。切除桡骨头后,将一根斯氏针插入桡骨髓腔,并用于在肱骨小头标记针的位置。我们施加1千克力向外侧牵拉桡骨近端,并在前臂完全旋后、中立位和完全旋前时,分别在肘关节伸直和90°屈曲状态下测量移位情况。所有测量在IOL完整时进行一次,然后在IOL切断后再次进行。为评估诊断效能,构建了受试者工作特征曲线。为确定该技术的质量,我们测量了每个位置的受试者工作特征曲线下面积。我们还确定了获得最高灵敏度和特异性的临界值。
伸直 - 旋后位和屈曲 - 旋后位测试的曲线下面积表明,这些位置对诊断IOL断裂非常理想。伸直 - 旋后位时,侧向移位临界值为5.5毫米,灵敏度为100%,特异性为90%。在屈曲 - 旋后位,临界值为9毫米时,诊断IOL断裂的灵敏度为100%,特异性为90%。
该操作在IOL完全断裂的尸体中可靠且准确。在术中情况下,这些结果很可能具有可重复性。
研究类型/证据水平:诊断性研究II级