Suppr超能文献

使用荟萃分析评估甲苯胺蓝在口腔癌筛查中的应用。

Use of meta-analysis to evaluate tolonium chloride in oral cancer screening.

作者信息

Rosenberg D, Cretin S

机构信息

St. Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, N.Y.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1989 May;67(5):621-7. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(89)90286-7.

Abstract

This study used meta-analysis, an analytical technique that uses raw data from previous researchers, to estimate the efficacy of screening for oral cancer with tolonium chloride (TCl). TCl, a vital blue dye, selectively stains acid tissue components such as DNA and RNA and has been used for more than 20 years by surgeons to identify suspected cancerous lesions. It has not been routinely used by dentists to screen either general or high-risk populations. Sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values for the TCl test, were calculated. Sensitivity of TCl ranged from 97.8% to 93.5%, and specificity ranged from 92.9% to 73.3%. It was determined that if TCl is used to screen high-risk populations, the likelihood of a false negative finding is extremely low, whereas false positive results will be relatively numerous. However, given the high sensitivity of the test, the absolute number of false positive tests will be small. Further analysis is needed to evaluate the economic costs of false positives and false negatives, versus the value of identifying true positives at an early stage.

摘要

本研究采用荟萃分析(一种利用先前研究人员的原始数据的分析技术)来评估用甲苯胺蓝(TCl)筛查口腔癌的疗效。TCl是一种活性蓝色染料,可选择性地对DNA和RNA等酸性组织成分进行染色,外科医生使用它来识别可疑癌性病变已有20多年。牙医尚未常规使用它来筛查普通人群或高危人群。计算了TCl检测的敏感性和特异性,以及阳性和阴性预测值。TCl的敏感性范围为97.8%至93.5%,特异性范围为92.9%至73.3%。研究确定,如果使用TCl筛查高危人群,假阴性结果的可能性极低,而假阳性结果相对较多。然而,鉴于该检测的高敏感性,假阳性检测的绝对数量将很少。需要进一步分析来评估假阳性和假阴性的经济成本,以及与早期识别真阳性的价值之间的关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验