• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新泽西州浸润性宫颈癌发病率差异——高发病率州的空间分析

Invasive Cervical Cancer Incidence Disparities in New Jersey--a Spatial Analysis in a High Incidence State.

作者信息

Roche Lisa M, Niu Xiaoling, Henry Kevin A

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Nov;26(4):1173-85. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0127.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2015.0127
PMID:26548671
Abstract

Although invasive cervical cancer incidence has declined, disparities persist. We identified spatial clusters of census tracts with elevated invasive cervical cancer incidence rates using New Jersey State Cancer Registry cases 20 years or older diagnosed in 2005-2009. Each cluster's population was compared with the rest of New Jersey's population on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Odds ratios that assessed associations between statistically significant characteristics (from a univariate comparison of cases in the clusters versus cases in the rest of New Jersey) and being a case in a cluster versus being a case in the rest of New Jersey were calculated from logistic regression models. Significant incidence clusters were identified around Newark, Trenton, and Camden. Being Black (all areas), Hispanic (Newark, Camden), unmarried (Newark), and uninsured/Medicaid-insured (Trenton) were significantly associated with being a case in these areas. These study results can be used to target invasive cervical cancer prevention efforts more effectively.

摘要

尽管浸润性宫颈癌的发病率有所下降,但差异依然存在。我们利用2005 - 2009年新泽西州癌症登记处确诊的20岁及以上病例,确定了浸润性宫颈癌发病率升高的普查区空间聚集情况。将每个聚集区的人口与新泽西州其他人口在人口统计学和社会经济特征方面进行比较。通过逻辑回归模型计算优势比,评估统计学上显著特征(来自聚集区病例与新泽西州其他地区病例的单变量比较)与在聚集区为病例与在新泽西州其他地区为病例之间的关联。在纽瓦克、特伦顿和卡姆登周围发现了显著的发病聚集区。黑人(所有地区)、西班牙裔(纽瓦克、卡姆登)、未婚(纽瓦克)以及未参保/参加医疗补助保险(特伦顿)与这些地区的发病情况显著相关。这些研究结果可用于更有效地针对浸润性宫颈癌预防工作。

相似文献

1
Invasive Cervical Cancer Incidence Disparities in New Jersey--a Spatial Analysis in a High Incidence State.新泽西州浸润性宫颈癌发病率差异——高发病率州的空间分析
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Nov;26(4):1173-85. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0127.
2
Cervical cancer sociodemographic and diagnostic disparities in Florida: a population-based study (1981-2013) by stage at presentation.佛罗里达州宫颈癌的社会人口统计学和诊断差异:一项基于人群的研究(1981 - 2013年),按就诊时的分期划分
Ethn Health. 2020 Oct;25(7):995-1003. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1471669. Epub 2018 May 5.
3
Cervical cancer and health care resources in Newark, New Jersey, 1970 to 1988.1970年至1988年新泽西州纽瓦克市的宫颈癌与医疗保健资源
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):45-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.45.
4
Disparities in geospatial patterns of cancer care within urban counties and structural inequities in access to oncology care.城市县内癌症护理的地理空间模式差异和肿瘤护理获取方面的结构性不平等。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):152-164. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14182. Epub 2023 May 19.
5
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Disparities in Private and Medicaid Insurance Coverage Among Patients Under 65 With Newly Diagnosed Cancer.平价医疗法案对 65 岁以下新诊断癌症患者私人保险和医疗补助保险覆盖差异的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Sep 1;105(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.033. Epub 2019 May 29.
6
Carcinoma of the cervix in Newark, New Jersey, 1970-76. A very low in situ: invasive ratio.1970 - 1976年新泽西州纽瓦克市的宫颈癌。原位癌与浸润癌比例极低。
J Reprod Med. 1981 Oct;26(10):513-8.
7
Burden of cervical cancer in the United States, 1998-2003.1998 - 2003年美国宫颈癌负担
Cancer. 2008 Nov 15;113(10 Suppl):2855-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23756.
8
Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer in Florida.佛罗里达州浸润性宫颈癌发病率的种族和民族差异。
Cancer. 2009 Sep 1;115(17):3991-4000. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24427.
9
Geographic variations of racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer mortality in Texas.德克萨斯州宫颈癌死亡率中种族/民族差异的地理变异
South Med J. 2014 May;107(5):281-8. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000100.
10
Insurance coverage among women diagnosed with a gynecologic malignancy before and after implementation of the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施前后诊断为妇科恶性肿瘤的女性的保险覆盖情况。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):457-464. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.宫颈癌护理与生存结果中的结构性种族主义:对不平等与障碍的系统评价
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00360-y. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
2
Spatiotemporal dynamics and prevention strategies of cervical cancer incidence in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: an ecological study.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴宫颈癌发病率的时空动态及预防策略:一项生态学研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e089521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089521.
3
A Proposed mHealth Intervention to Address Patient Barriers to Colposcopy Attendance: Qualitative Interview Study of Clinic Staff and Patient Perspectives.
一项旨在解决患者阴道镜检查就诊障碍的移动健康干预措施:针对诊所工作人员和患者观点的定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 14;9:e55043. doi: 10.2196/55043.
4
Chatbot-interfaced and cognitive-affective barrier-driven messages to improve colposcopy adherence after abnormal Pap test results in underserved urban women: A feasibility pilot study.基于聊天机器人界面和认知情感障碍驱动的信息,提高服务不足的城市女性异常巴氏试验结果后的阴道镜检查依从性:一项可行性试点研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):1-12. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad064.
5
Geographic Variation in Late-Stage Cervical Cancer Diagnosis.晚期宫颈癌诊断的地理差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2343152. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43152.
6
Application of GIS Spatial Analysis and Scanning Statistics in the Gynecological Cancer Clustering Pattern and Risk Screening: A Case Study in Northern Jiangxi Province, China.地理信息系统空间分析与扫描统计在妇科癌症聚集模式及风险筛查中的应用:以中国江西省北部为例
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Aug 10;13:1079-1093. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S261221. eCollection 2020.
7
Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Latina Mothers of South American and Caribbean Descent in the Eastern US.美国东部南美和加勒比血统拉丁裔母亲对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的认知与态度
Health Equity. 2019 May 30;3(1):219-230. doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0058. eCollection 2019.