Psychology Program, Grenfell Campus, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 20 University Drive, Corner Brook, NL, A2H 5G4, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Behav Sci Law. 2015 Nov-Dec;33(6):784-800. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2210. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
A total of 1,074 undergraduates judged the truthfulness of children's interviews (from verbatim transcripts) about experiencing injuries serious enough to require hospital emergency room treatment. Ninety-six children (three age groups: 5-7, 8-10, and 11-14 years, 50% girls) were interviewed. At each age, 16 children told truthful accounts of actual injury experiences and 16 fabricated their reports, with half of each group coached by parents for the previous 4 days. Lies by 5- to 7-year-olds, whether coached or not, were detected at above-chance levels. In contrast, 8- to 10-year-olds' accounts that were coached, whether true or not, were more likely to be believed. For 11- to 14-year-olds, adults were less likely to accurately judge lies if they were coached. The believability of children aged 8 or above who were coached to lie is particularly disturbing in light of the finding that participants were more confident in the accuracy of their veracity decisions when judging coached reports.
共有 1074 名本科生判断了儿童对受伤经历的真实描述(来自逐字记录),这些受伤经历严重到需要去医院急诊室治疗。96 名儿童(三个年龄组:5-7 岁、8-10 岁和 11-14 岁,女孩各占 50%)接受了采访。在每个年龄组中,有 16 名儿童讲述了真实的受伤经历,有 16 名儿童编造了他们的报告,其中每组有一半的儿童在前 4 天接受了家长的指导。无论是经过指导还是未经指导,5-7 岁儿童的谎言都能被检测到,且超过了随机水平。相比之下,无论真实与否,经过指导的 8-10 岁儿童的陈述更有可能被相信。对于 11-14 岁的儿童来说,如果他们受到指导,成年人就不太可能准确判断出谎言。考虑到参与者在判断受指导的报告时,对其真实性判断的准确性更有信心,那么对于那些被指导说谎的 8 岁及以上儿童的可信度就更令人担忧了。