Suppr超能文献

检测儿童说谎:比较高度应激性伤害的真实陈述与未准备、准备和指导的谎言。

Detecting children's lies: comparing true accounts about highly stressful injuries with unprepared, prepared, and coached lies.

机构信息

Memorial University of Newfoundland.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2012 May-Jun;30(3):329-41. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1994. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

Abstract

In this investigation, 514 university students judged whether children were telling the truth about highly emotional events. Eight children (half female, half 8-9 and the remainder 12-14 years old) had been injured seriously enough to require emergency room treatment and were interviewed a few days later. Each was yoked to three other children matched in age and gender who fabricated accounts under one of three conditions: lies that were unprepared, prepared (24 hours to prepare), and coached by parents. Participants were at chance when judging true accounts as well as unprepared and prepared lies. However, 74% of the coached lies were judged as true. Participants' confidence in their judgments, age, experience with children, and relevant coursework/training did not improve judgments.

摘要

在这项研究中,514 名大学生判断儿童是否在高度情绪化的事件中说实话。8 名儿童(男女各半,年龄分别为 8-9 岁和 12-14 岁)因伤势严重需要接受急诊治疗,并在几天后接受采访。每个儿童都与另外三个年龄和性别相匹配的儿童相匹配,这些儿童在三种情况下编造了陈述:未准备好的谎言、准备好的(提前 24 小时准备)和由父母指导的谎言。在判断真实陈述以及未准备好的和准备好的谎言时,参与者是随机的。然而,74%的指导谎言被判断为真实。参与者对自己判断的信心、年龄、与儿童打交道的经验以及相关的课程/培训并没有提高判断能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验