Van Gundy Karen T, Howerton-Orcutt Amanda, Mills Meghan L
a Sociology, University of New Hampshire , Durham , New Hampshire , USA.
b Criminal Justice , Salem State University , Salem , Massachusetts , USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(11):1459-69. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1018544. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
Despite their higher rates of stress, African American young adults tend toward similar or lower rates of substance misuse than their White counterparts. Arguably, such patterns derive from: (1) racial variations in the availability of coping strategies that mitigate stress; and/or (2) racial differences in the efficacy of available coping styles for reducing substance misuse.
We assessed whether two coping style types-problem-focused and avoidance-oriented-varied by race (non-Hispanic African American vs. non-Hispanic White) and whether the effects of coping styles on substance misuse were moderated by race.
Using data from a community sample of South Florida young adults, we employed logistic regression analyses to examine racial differences in coping style and to test if race by coping style interactions (race × problem-focused coping and race × avoidance-oriented coping) influenced the odds of qualifying for a DSM-IV substance use disorder, net of lifetime stressful events and sociodemographic controls.
We found that African American young adults displayed lower problem-focused coping, and higher avoidance-oriented coping, than did White young adults. Among both African American and White respondents, problem-focused coping was associated with reduced odds of illicit drug use disorder (excluding marijuana), and among Whites, avoidance-oriented coping was associated with increased odds of an aggregate measure of alcohol, marijuana, and other illicit drug use disorders. Among African Americans, however, avoidance-oriented coping was associated with lower odds of marijuana use disorder.
Substance misuse policies and practices that consider the sociocultural contexts of stress and coping are recommended.
尽管非裔美国年轻人面临着更高的压力,但与白人同龄人相比,他们的药物滥用率往往相似或更低。可以说,这种模式源于:(1)减轻压力的应对策略的可获得性方面的种族差异;和/或(2)现有应对方式在减少药物滥用方面的效果的种族差异。
我们评估了两种应对方式类型——以问题为导向和回避导向——是否因种族(非西班牙裔非裔美国人与非西班牙裔白人)而异,以及应对方式对药物滥用的影响是否受到种族的调节。
利用来自南佛罗里达年轻人社区样本的数据,我们采用逻辑回归分析来检验应对方式的种族差异,并测试应对方式与种族的交互作用(种族×以问题为导向的应对和种族×回避导向的应对)是否影响符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版物质使用障碍标准的几率,同时考虑终生应激事件和社会人口学控制因素。
我们发现,与白人年轻人相比,非裔美国年轻人以问题为导向的应对方式较少,而回避导向的应对方式较多。在非裔美国人和白人受访者中,以问题为导向的应对方式都与非法药物使用障碍(不包括大麻)几率的降低有关,而在白人中,回避导向的应对方式与酒精、大麻和其他非法药物使用障碍综合指标几率的增加有关。然而,在非裔美国人中,回避导向的应对方式与大麻使用障碍几率的降低有关。
建议制定考虑压力和应对的社会文化背景的药物滥用政策和措施。