• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量护理实践的结果:德尔菲研究。

Measuring the outcomes of nursing practice: A Delphi study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):e368-e378. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13971. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.13971
PMID:28722809
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To develop nursing-sensitive patient indicators to measure the outcomes of nursing practice.

BACKGROUND

Nurses play an important role in the healthcare system, yet there is no consensus on how the impact of nursing work should be evaluated. Limited research has previously examined the views of clinical nurses on the important concepts for measuring nursing practice.

DESIGN

A four-round modified Delphi survey sought opinions from patients and nurses about the relevant concepts and their relative priority as indicators of quality nursing practice.

METHOD

Round 1 comprised semi-structured interviews with patients and nurses to identify key concepts. Nurses were then asked to participate in three rounds of Delphi survey to identify and rate key concepts from which indicators were developed. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

By the end of Round 4, the process had generated 103 concepts and participants had agreed on eight overarching constructs, namely care and caring; communication; coordination and collaboration; safety; patient characteristics; workload; Nurses work environment; and organisational characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus was achieved between nurses on the most important concepts, which can provide the basis for measuring the quality and safety of nursing practice in a comprehensive and holistic way.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The identification of concepts that patients and nurses consider important for measuring nursing practice will guide the development of methods for evaluating nursing in the future. Ensuring that nursing practice is rigorously evaluated has the potential to identify opportunities to improve nursing quality, patient safety and improve health outcomes.

摘要

目的

开发护理敏感的患者指标,以衡量护理实践的结果。

背景

护士在医疗保健系统中发挥着重要作用,但对于如何评估护理工作的影响尚未达成共识。以前的研究很少探讨临床护士对衡量护理实践的重要概念的看法。

设计

四轮改良德尔菲调查征求了患者和护士对相关概念的意见,并对其作为优质护理实践指标的相对重要性进行了评估。

方法

第一轮包括对患者和护士进行半结构化访谈,以确定关键概念。然后要求护士参加三轮德尔菲调查,以确定和评估关键概念,从而制定指标。使用主题分析和描述性统计来分析数据。

结果

在第四轮结束时,该过程共产生了 103 个概念,参与者就八个总体结构达成一致,即护理和关怀;沟通;协调与合作;安全;患者特征;工作量;护士工作环境;和组织特征。

结论

护士就衡量护理实践最重要的概念达成了共识,这可以为全面、整体地衡量护理实践的质量和安全提供基础。

临床实践的相关性

确定患者和护士认为对衡量护理实践重要的概念将指导未来评估护理方法的发展。严格评估护理实践有可能确定改善护理质量、患者安全和改善健康结果的机会。

相似文献

1
Measuring the outcomes of nursing practice: A Delphi study.测量护理实践的结果:德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):e368-e378. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13971. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
2
An international Delphi study examining health promotion and health education in nursing practice, education and policy.一项审视护理实践、教育及政策中的健康促进与健康教育的国际德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Apr;17(7):891-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02079.x.
3
The development of Nursing Quality Care Process Metrics and Indicators for use in Older Persons Care Settings: A Delphi-Consensus Study.《老年人护理环境中护理质量关怀流程指标的制定:德尔菲共识研究》
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3471-3484. doi: 10.1111/jan.14126. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
4
Research priorities in nursing--a Delphi study among Swedish nurses.护理领域的研究重点——一项针对瑞典护士的德尔菲研究
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2221-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02083.x.
5
International experts' perspectives on the state of the nurse staffing and patient outcomes literature.国际专家对护士人员配备状况及患者预后文献的看法。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(4):290-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00183.x.
6
Using the Delphi method to develop nursing-sensitive quality indicators for the NICU.运用德尔菲法制定新生儿重症监护病房护理敏感质量指标。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Feb;26(3-4):502-513. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13474. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
7
Development of nursing quality care process metrics and indicators for intellectual disability services: a literature review and modified Delphi consensus study.智力残疾服务护理质量过程指标的制定:文献综述与改良德尔菲共识研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):909. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4749-y.
8
Systematic review of evidence on the impact of nursing workload and staffing on establishing healthy work environments.系统评价护理工作量和人员配置对建立健康工作环境的影响的证据。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2006 Dec;4(4):337-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2006.00055.x.
9
Establishing nursing-sensitive quality indicators for pediatric oncology: An international mixed methods Delphi study.建立儿科肿瘤护理敏感质量指标:一项国际混合方法德尔菲研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):388-400. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12798. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
10
Nursing physical assessment for patient safety in general wards: reaching consensus on core skills.综合病房中保障患者安全的护理体格检查:就核心技能达成共识
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1890-900. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13201. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Toolbox Trainings on Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators: A Randomized Controlled Trial.工具箱培训对护理敏感质量指标的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 May;57(3):439-451. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13051. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Quality care for children and young people with complex and integrated care needs: A discussion on nursing-sensitive indicators.为有复杂和综合护理需求的儿童及青少年提供优质护理:关于护理敏感指标的讨论
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Nov 29;8:100275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100275. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The pressure injury prevalence and practice improvements (PIPPI) study: A multiple methods evaluation of pressure injury prevention practices in an acute-care hospital.
压力性损伤发生率和实践改进(PIPPI)研究:对一家急症医院压力性损伤预防实践的多种方法评估。
Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70050. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70050.
4
The development of nursing-sensitive indicators: A critical discussion.护理敏感指标的发展:批判性讨论
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Jul 24;7:100227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100227. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Priorities for enhancing nurses' and social workers' competence and confidence in helping families support dependent children through parental death. A classic-Delphi survey.优先事项是提高护士和社会工作者的能力和信心,以帮助家庭支持因父母去世而依赖的子女。一项经典的德尔菲调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 May 17;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01452-0.
6
Association of mode of entry to a nursing programme and student success: A two-year retrospective multi-cohort study.护理专业入学模式与学生学业成就的关联:一项为期两年的回顾性多队列研究。
Health SA. 2024 Apr 23;29:2560. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2560. eCollection 2024.
7
Nursing Sensitive Outcomes evaluation in the Emergency Department: An Umbrella Review.急诊科护理敏感结局评价:伞式综述。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2023 Nov;41(3). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v41n3e03.
8
Development of Postgraduate Psychiatric Nursing Students' Clinical Competency Questionnaire.研究生精神科护理学生临床能力问卷的编制
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2023 Oct;11(4):240-251. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.98879.1814.
9
The experience of staff utilizing data to evaluate and improve person-centred practice: An action research study.工作人员利用数据评估和改进以患者为中心的实践的经验:一项行动研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3457-3469. doi: 10.1111/jan.15386. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Systematic review: Nurses' safety attitudes and their impact on patient outcomes in acute-care hospitals.系统评价:急性护理医院护士的安全态度及其对患者结局的影响。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):30-43. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1063. Epub 2021 Sep 19.