Budd Graham E
Department of Earth Sciences, Palaeobiology Programme, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, Uppsala 752 36, Sweden
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 19;370(1684). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0037.
Understanding the evolution of early nervous systems is hazardous because we lack good criteria for determining homology between the systems of distant taxa; the timing of the evolutionary events is contested, and thus the relevant ecological and geological settings for them are also unclear. Here I argue that no simple approach will resolve the first issue, but that it remains likely that animals evolved relatively late, and that their nervous systems thus arose during the late Ediacaran, in a context provided by the changing planktonic and benthic environments of the time. The early trace fossil provides the most concrete evidence for early behavioural diversification, but it cannot simply be translated into increasing nervous system complexity: behavioural complexity does not map on a one-to-one basis onto nervous system complexity, both because of possible limitations to behaviour caused by the environment and because we know that even organisms without nervous systems are capable of relatively complex behaviour.
理解早期神经系统的演化是有风险的,因为我们缺乏确定远缘分类群系统间同源性的良好标准;进化事件的时间存在争议,因此与之相关的生态和地质背景也不清楚。在这里我认为,没有简单的方法能解决第一个问题,但动物很可能进化得相对较晚,因此它们的神经系统是在埃迪卡拉纪晚期,在当时浮游和底栖环境变化的背景下出现的。早期遗迹化石为早期行为多样化提供了最具体的证据,但它不能简单地等同于神经系统复杂性的增加:行为复杂性与神经系统复杂性并非一一对应,这既是因为环境可能对行为有限制,也是因为我们知道即使是没有神经系统的生物也能表现出相对复杂的行为。