Nematianaraki Saeid, Fekrazad Reza, Naghibi Nasim, Kalhori Katayoun Am, Junior Aldo Brugnera
Department of Operative Dentistry. Dental School.Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences. Tehran.
Laser Research Center in Medical Sciences (LRCMS), AJA University of medical Sciences. Tehran.
Laser Ther. 2015 Oct 2;24(3):173-7. doi: 10.5978/islsm.15-OR-10.
One of the major side effects of vital bleaching is the reduction of enamel micro-hardness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of two different bleaching systems, Plasma Arc and GaAlAs laser, on the enamel micro-hardness.
15 freshly extracted human third molars were sectioned to prepare 30 enamel blocks (5×5 mm). These samples were then randomly divided into 2 groups of 15 each (n=15): a plasma arc bleaching group (: 350-700 nm) + 35% Hydrogen Peroxide whitening gel and a laser bleaching group (GaAlAs laser, λ: 810 nm, P: 10 W, CW, Special Tip) + 35% Hydrogen Peroxide whitening gel. Samples were subjected to the Vickers micro-hardness test (VHN) at a load of 50 g for 15s before and after treatment. Data were statistically analyzed by a Mann-Whitney test (p≤0.05).
In the GaAlAs laser group, the enamel micro-hardness was 618.2 before and was reduced to 544.6 after bleaching procedures. In the plasma arc group, the enamel micro-hardness was 644.8 before and 498.9 after bleaching. Although both techniques significantly reduced VHN, plasma arc bleaching resulted in a 22.62% reduction in VHN for enamel micro-hardness, whereas an 11.89% reduction in VHN was observed for laser bleaching; this difference is statistically significant (p<0.001).
Both bleaching techniques reduced enamel micro-hardness, although the reduction is much less significant with the GaAlAs laser than with the plasma arc. Therefore GaAlAs laser bleaching has fewer harmful effects than plasma arc in respect to enamel micro-hardness reduction.
活髓牙漂白的主要副作用之一是牙釉质显微硬度降低。本研究的目的是评估两种不同的漂白系统,即等离子弧和砷化镓铝激光,对牙釉质显微硬度的影响。
将15颗新鲜拔除的人类第三磨牙切片,制备30个牙釉质块(5×5毫米)。然后将这些样本随机分为2组,每组15个(n = 15):等离子弧漂白组(波长:350 - 700纳米)+ 35%过氧化氢美白凝胶和激光漂白组(砷化镓铝激光,波长:810纳米,功率:10瓦,连续波,特殊尖端)+ 35%过氧化氢美白凝胶。在处理前后,对样本施加50克载荷进行15秒的维氏显微硬度测试(VHN)。数据采用曼-惠特尼检验进行统计学分析(p≤0.05)。
在砷化镓铝激光组中,牙釉质显微硬度在漂白前为618.2,漂白后降至544.6。在等离子弧组中,牙釉质显微硬度在漂白前为644.8,漂白后为498.9。尽管两种技术均显著降低了VHN,但等离子弧漂白导致牙釉质显微硬度的VHN降低了22.62%,而激光漂白的VHN降低了11.89%;这种差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。
两种漂白技术均降低了牙釉质显微硬度,尽管砷化镓铝激光造成的降低比等离子弧小得多。因此,就降低牙釉质显微硬度而言,砷化镓铝激光漂白比等离子弧具有更少的有害影响。