Delfino Carina Sinclér, Chinelatti Michelle Alexandra, Carrasco-Guerisoli Laíse Daniela, Batista Andrigo Reis, Fröner Izabel Cristina, Palma-Dibb Regina Guenka
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Jul-Aug;17(4):284-8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000400004.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of different home bleaching agents on color alteration and their influence on surface and subsurface microhardness of discolored bovine enamel.
Forty-five fragments of bovine incisors were randomly allocated into 3 groups (n=15) according to the bleaching agent: 10% carbamide peroxide gel (CP10), 16% carbamide peroxide gel (CP16) and 6.5%-hydrogen-peroxide-based strip (HP6.5). Before bleaching treatment, initial values of Knoop surface microhardness and color (CIEL a b) were obtained and the fragments were artificially stained in hemolyzed rat blood. Then, bleaching treatments were performed over a 21-day period. Color changes (DeltaE) were assessed at 7, 14 and 21 days, and final surface microhardness reading was done after 21 days. Thereafter, the fragments were bisected to obtain subsurface microhardness. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's tests (alpha=5%).
Color changes produced by CP16 were similar to those of CP10, and the color changes produced by these materials were significantly superior to those produced by HP6.5. Color changes at 21 days were superior to 7 days and similar to 14 days. The time did not influence color changes for CP16, which showed similarity between the 14- and 21-day results. No statistically significant differences were found among the home bleaching agents for surface and subsurface microhardness.
Microhardness of bovine enamel was not affected by the bleaching agents. The 16% carbamide peroxide gel was the most effective for bleaching the stained substrate.
本研究评估了不同家用漂白剂对变色牛牙釉质颜色改变的有效性及其对表面和亚表面显微硬度的影响。
根据漂白剂将45颗牛切牙碎片随机分为3组(n = 15):10%过氧化脲凝胶(CP10)、16%过氧化脲凝胶(CP16)和6.5%过氧化氢基牙贴(HP6.5)。在漂白处理前,获取努氏表面显微硬度和颜色(CIEL a b)的初始值,并将碎片在溶血大鼠血液中进行人工染色。然后,在21天内进行漂白处理。在第7、14和21天评估颜色变化(ΔE),并在21天后进行最终表面显微硬度读数。此后,将碎片对半切开以获得亚表面显微硬度。数据进行方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 5%)。
CP16产生的颜色变化与CP10相似,且这些材料产生的颜色变化显著优于HP6.5产生的颜色变化。21天时的颜色变化优于7天且与14天相似。时间对CP16的颜色变化没有影响,14天和21天的结果相似。家用漂白剂在表面和亚表面显微硬度方面未发现统计学显著差异。
牛牙釉质的显微硬度不受漂白剂影响。16%过氧化脲凝胶对染色底物的漂白效果最有效。