• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Tracing expert thinking in clinical trial design.

作者信息

Malogolowkin M H, Horowitz R S, Ortega J A, Siegel S E, Hammond G D, Weiner J M

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, California 90027.

出版信息

Comput Biomed Res. 1989 Apr;22(2):190-208. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(89)90025-6.

DOI:10.1016/0010-4809(89)90025-6
PMID:2656077
Abstract

This paper describes a method for the analysis of the clinical trial design process used by experts. With this procedure, the scientific ideas and their sources can be identified and related to the clinical trial protocol actually prepared by the experts. An example is given using the work of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Committee (IRS). That committee has been the primary contributor of information dealing with the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma in children. The IRS-III protocol was used in this analysis of expert behavior because the protocol was adopted by the leading pediatric oncology clinical trial groups in North America and Europe. The analysis showed that the experts rely heavily, for much of the design, on ideas presented in numerical displays in published documents. Further, those aspects of the design which are innovative can be traced and better understood by applying the new procedure.

摘要

相似文献

1
Tracing expert thinking in clinical trial design.
Comput Biomed Res. 1989 Apr;22(2):190-208. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(89)90025-6.
2
Pretreatment TNM staging of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group. Children's Cancer Study Group. Pediatric Oncology Group.儿童横纹肌肉瘤的治疗前TNM分期:横纹肌肉瘤协作组、儿童癌症研究组、儿科肿瘤学组的报告
Cancer. 1997 Sep 15;80(6):1165-70.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
An example of expert systems applied to clinical trials: analysis of serial graded exercise ECG test data.应用于临床试验的专家系统示例:连续分级运动心电图测试数据分析。
Control Clin Trials. 1987 Jun;8(2):136-45. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90038-9.
5
Pooled analysis of phase II window studies in children with contemporary high-risk metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group.当代高危转移性横纹肌肉瘤患儿II期窗口期研究的汇总分析:儿童肿瘤学组软组织肉瘤委员会的报告
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 20;24(21):3415-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.9497.
6
Efaproxiral: GSJ 61, JP 4, KDD 86, RS 4, RSR 13.依氟普胺:GSJ 61、JP 4、KDD 86、RS 4、RSR 13。
Drugs R D. 2005;6(3):178-85. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200506030-00007.
7
Evaluation of intensified chemotherapy in children with advanced rhabdomyosarcoma (clinical groups III and IV). The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) Committee of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Children's Cancer Study Group, Southwest Oncology Group.晚期横纹肌肉瘤(临床分组III和IV)患儿强化化疗的评估。癌症与白血病B组儿童癌症研究组、西南肿瘤学组横纹肌肉瘤研究组(IRS)委员会。
Cancer Clin Trials. 1979 Spring;2(1):19-28.
8
Prognostic significance of staging factors of the UICC staging system in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS-II).国际儿童横纹肌肉瘤协作组研究(IRS-II)报告:UICC分期系统的分期因素在儿童横纹肌肉瘤中的预后意义
J Clin Oncol. 1987 Jan;5(1):46-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.1.46.
9
The Third Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study.第三项横纹肌肉瘤多组协作研究
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Mar;13(3):610-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.3.610.
10
The role of adaptive trial designs in drug development.适应性试验设计在药物研发中的作用。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;10(7):727-736. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2017.1321985. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A knowledgebase system to enhance scientific discovery: Telemakus.一个用于促进科学发现的知识库系统:忒勒马科斯。
Biomed Digit Libr. 2004 Sep 21;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1742-5581-1-2. eCollection 2004.
2
Comparison of information processing technologies.信息处理技术的比较
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Mar-Apr;8(2):174-84. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080174.
3
Knowledge representation and tool support for critiquing clinical trial protocols.用于审查临床试验方案的知识表示与工具支持。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:724-8.