Al-Qurayshi Zaid, Robins Russell, Hauch Adam, Randolph Gregory W, Kandil Emad
Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
A. B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan;142(1):32-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2503.
Incidence of thyroidectomies is continuing to increase. Identifying factors associated with favorable outcomes can lead to cost savings.
To assess the association of surgeon volume with clinical outcomes and costs of thyroidectomy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional analysis performed in October of 2014 of adult (≥ 18 years) inpatients in US community hospitals using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for the years 2003 through 2009.
Thyroidectomy.
Complications, length of stay, and cost following thyroidectomy in relation to surgeon volume. Surgeon volumes were stratified into low (1-3 thyroidectomies per year), intermediate (4-29 thyroidectomies per year), and high (≥ 30 thyroidectomies per year).
A total of 77,863 patients were included. Procedures performed by low-volume surgeons were associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications compared with high-volume surgeons (15.8% vs 7.7%; OR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.19-2.03]; P = .001). Mean (SD) hospital cost was significantly associated with surgeon volume (high volume, $6662.69 [$409.31]; intermediate volume, $6912.41 [$137.20]; low volume, $10,396.21 [$345.17]; P < .001). During the study period, if all operations performed by low-volume surgeons had been selectively referred to intermediate- or high-volume surgeons, savings of 11.2% or 12.2%, respectively, would have been incurred. On the basis of the cost growth rate, greater savings are forecasted for high-volume surgeons. With a conservative assumption of 150,000 thyroidectomies per year in the United States, referral of all patients to intermediate- or high-volume surgeons would produce savings of $2.08 billion or $3.11 billion, respectively, over a span of 14 years.
A surgeon's expertise (measured by surgical volume of procedures per year) is associated with favorable clinical as well as financial outcomes. Our model estimates that considerable cost savings are attainable if higher-volume surgeons perform thyroid procedures in the United States.
甲状腺切除术的发病率持续上升。确定与良好预后相关的因素可节省成本。
评估外科医生手术量与甲状腺切除术的临床结局及成本之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:2014年10月对2003年至2009年美国社区医院的成年(≥18岁)住院患者进行横断面分析,使用全国住院患者样本。
甲状腺切除术。
甲状腺切除术后的并发症、住院时间及成本与外科医生手术量的关系。外科医生手术量分为低(每年1 - 3例甲状腺切除术)、中(每年4 - 29例甲状腺切除术)、高(每年≥30例甲状腺切除术)三组。
共纳入77,863例患者。与高手术量外科医生相比,低手术量外科医生进行的手术术后并发症风险更高(15.8%对7.7%;比值比,1.55[95%置信区间,1.19 - 2.03];P = 0.001)。平均(标准差)住院成本与外科医生手术量显著相关(高手术量,6662.69美元[409.31美元];中手术量,6912.41美元[137.20美元];低手术量,10396.21美元[345.17美元];P < 0.001)。在研究期间,如果低手术量外科医生进行的所有手术都选择性地转诊给中手术量或高手术量外科医生,分别可节省11.2%或12.2%的成本。基于成本增长率,预计高手术量外科医生可节省更多成本。在美国每年保守估计有150,000例甲状腺切除术的情况下,将所有患者转诊给中手术量或高手术量外科医生,在14年的时间跨度内分别可节省20.8亿美元或31.1亿美元。
外科医生的专业技能(以每年手术量衡量)与良好的临床及经济结局相关。我们的模型估计,如果美国由高手术量的外科医生进行甲状腺手术,可实现可观的成本节省。