• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the quality of thyroidectomy-related posts on a video-based social media platform.基于视频的社交媒体平台上甲状腺切除术后相关帖子的质量评估
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Oct 23;8(6):1685-1691. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1174. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.《TikTok 上与 Takotsubo 综合征相关视频的质量和观众参与度:内容分析》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e39360. doi: 10.2196/39360.
3
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.TikTok 胆囊疾病相关视频信息质量:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.
4
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
5
An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok.TikTok上与口服避孕药相关视频的分析。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jun 12;4(3):100364. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100364. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Evaluation of TikTok videos on acute pancreatitis: content quality and reliability analysis.抖音上关于急性胰腺炎的视频评估:内容质量与可靠性分析
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 2;24(1):1216. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18708-2.
7
Validity of Material Related to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament on TikTok.TikTok上与前交叉韧带相关内容的有效性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Feb 22;12(2):23259671241228543. doi: 10.1177/23259671241228543. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
#Neurosurgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Neurosurgical Content on TikTok.神经外科:TikTok上神经外科内容的横断面分析
World Neurosurg X. 2022 Sep 9;17:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100137. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Evaluating the Distribution, Quality, and Educational Value of Videos Related to Knee Instability Exercises on the Social Media Platform TikTok.评估社交媒体平台TikTok上与膝关节不稳定练习相关视频的分布、质量和教育价值。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 28;16(3):e57104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57104. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
TikTok as an Information Hodgepodge: Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of Genitourinary Cancers Related Content.作为信息大杂烩的TikTok:泌尿生殖系统癌症相关内容的质量与可靠性评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 15;12:789956. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.789956. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality, Reliability and Accuracy of Hyperthyroidism-Related Content on Social Media Platform TikTok.社交媒体平台TikTok上与甲状腺功能亢进相关内容的质量、可靠性和准确性。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Sep;8(5):e70105. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70105.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival after hemithyroidectomy versus total thyroidectomy in non-high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: population-based analysis.非高危分化型甲状腺癌行甲状腺半切除术与甲状腺全切除术的生存比较:基于人群的分析。
BJS Open. 2022 Nov 2;6(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac146.
2
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Gender-affirming Surgery Videos on YouTube and TikTok.评估YouTube和TikTok上性别确认手术视频的质量与可靠性。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jul 28;10(7):e4443. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004443. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Orthodontic clear aligners and TikTok videos: A content, reliability and quality analysis.正畸透明矫治器与TikTok视频:内容、可靠性及质量分析
Int Orthod. 2022 Sep;20(3):100663. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100663. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
4
Assessing the Quality of Hearing Aids-Related Videos on TikTok.评估 TikTok 上与助听器相关的视频质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;10:901976. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.901976. eCollection 2022.
5
Tonsillectomy and social media: An investigative analysis of educational tonsillectomy content on TikTok.扁桃体切除术与社交媒体:对TikTok上扁桃体切除术教育内容的调查分析
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 27;5(4):e618. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.618. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
TikTok as an Information Hodgepodge: Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of Genitourinary Cancers Related Content.作为信息大杂烩的TikTok:泌尿生殖系统癌症相关内容的质量与可靠性评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 15;12:789956. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.789956. eCollection 2022.
7
TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.TikTok 作为健康信息来源:糖尿病相关视频信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):e30409. doi: 10.2196/30409.
8
Analyzing the Quality of Aesthetic Surgery Procedure Videos on TikTok.分析 TikTok 上美容手术流程视频的质量。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):2078-2083. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab291.
9
Risk Assessment in Thyroid Lobectomy and Total Thyroidectomy using Over 100 Thousand Cases.使用超过 10 万例病例评估甲状腺叶切除术和甲状腺全切除术的风险。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 Dec;130(12):1351-1359. doi: 10.1177/00034894211007219. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
On the Psychology of TikTok Use: A First Glimpse From Empirical Findings.TikTok 使用的心理学研究:来自实证研究的初步发现。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;9:641673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.641673. eCollection 2021.

基于视频的社交媒体平台上甲状腺切除术后相关帖子的质量评估

Evaluation of the quality of thyroidectomy-related posts on a video-based social media platform.

作者信息

Kim Yun J, Lin Matthew, Davis Ryan J, Ayo-Ajibola Oluwatobiloba, Kwon Daniel, Hur Kevin

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA.

Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Oct 23;8(6):1685-1691. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1174. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/lio2.1174
PMID:38130243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10731508/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of thyroidectomy-related posts on TikTok, the fastest-growing social media platform worldwide.

METHODS

Videos posted from April 2020 to September 2022 were queried on TikTok using the search terms "thyroidsurgery," "thyroidectomy," and "thyroidremoval." Two reviewers recorded thematic, demographic, and performance data of these posts. The DISCERN instrument was used to evaluate the quality and reliability of the information contained in the videos. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize post-submitter demographics and video content. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between DISCERN scores and video characteristics. Univariate analysis of variance was performed to compare DISCERN scores between author types.

RESULTS

In this study, 228 TikTok videos were included which totaled over 23 million views. On average, each video accumulated more than 6000 "likes," 300 comments, and 70 shares. The average total DISCERN score was 27.46, which is deemed to be of poor overall quality. Upon multiple linear regression, video duration ( = 4.66,  < .001) and educational subject type ( = 3.97,  < .001) significantly positively predicted aggregate DISCERN scores, while journey subject type ( = -3.19,  = .006), and reassurance subject type ( = -2.52,  = .035) significantly negatively predicted aggregate DISCERN scores. Aggregate DISCERN scores varied significantly ( < .05) between author types.

CONCLUSION

Social media posts on TikTok about thyroidectomy are mostly of poor quality and reliability but vary by authorship, subject type, and video characteristics. Given its widespread popularity, TikTok videos may have an increasing role in shaping patient perception of thyroidectomy and may represent an opportunity to provide education.

LAY SUMMARY

TikTok posts about thyroidectomy are mostly of poor quality but vary by authorship, subject, and video characteristics. Given its popularity, TikTok videos may have a role in shaping the patient perception of thyroidectomy and may represent an opportunity to provide education.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

摘要

目的

评估在全球增长最快的社交媒体平台TikTok上与甲状腺切除术相关帖子的质量。

方法

在TikTok上使用搜索词“甲状腺手术”“甲状腺切除术”和“甲状腺切除”查询2020年4月至2022年9月发布的视频。两名评审员记录这些帖子的主题、人口统计学和表现数据。使用DISCERN工具评估视频中所含信息的质量和可靠性。描述性统计用于描述帖子提交者的人口统计学特征和视频内容。简单和多元线性回归分析用于评估DISCERN评分与视频特征之间的关联。进行单因素方差分析以比较不同作者类型的DISCERN评分。

结果

本研究纳入了228条TikTok视频,总观看量超过2300万次。平均每条视频获得超过6000个“赞”、300条评论和70次分享。DISCERN总评分平均为27.46,整体质量被认为较差。多元线性回归分析显示,视频时长(β = 4.66,P <.001)和教育主题类型(β = 3.97,P <.001)对DISCERN总评分有显著正向预测作用,而经历主题类型(β = -3.19,P = 0.006)和安抚主题类型(β = -2.52,P = 0.035)对DISCERN总评分有显著负向预测作用。不同作者类型的DISCERN总评分差异显著(P <.05)。

结论

TikTok上关于甲状腺切除术的社交媒体帖子大多质量和可靠性较差,但因作者、主题类型和视频特征而异。鉴于其广泛的受欢迎程度,TikTok视频在塑造患者对甲状腺切除术的认知方面可能发挥越来越大的作用,并且可能代表了一个提供教育的机会。

简要概述

TikTok上关于甲状腺切除术的帖子大多质量较差,但因作者、主题和视频特征而异。鉴于其受欢迎程度,TikTok视频可能在塑造患者对甲状腺切除术的认知方面发挥作用,并且可能代表了一个提供教育的机会。

证据级别

4级。