Lieurance Deah, Chakraborty Sourav, Whitehead Susan R, Powell Jeff R, Bonello Pierluigi, Bowers M Deane, Cipollini Don
Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Sciences PhD Program, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH, 45435, USA.
Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, PO Box 110500, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
J Chem Ecol. 2015 Dec;41(12):1069-79. doi: 10.1007/s10886-015-0648-9. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Non-native plants introduced to new habitats can have significant ecological impact. In many cases, even though they interact with the same community of potential herbivores as their new native competitors, they regularly receive less damage. Plants produce secondary metabolites in their leaves that serve a range of defensive functions, including resistance to herbivores and pathogens. Abiotic factors such as nutrient availability can influence the expression of defensive traits, with some species exhibiting increased chemical defense in low-nutrient conditions. Plants in the genus Lonicera are known to produce a diverse array of these secondary metabolites, yet non-native Lonicera species sustain lower amounts of herbivore damage than co-occurring native Lonicera species in North America. In this study, we searched for evidence of biochemical novelty in non-native species, and quantified its association with resistance to herbivores. In order to achieve this, we evaluated the phenolic and iridoid glycoside profiles in leaves of native and non-native Lonicera species grown under high and low fertilization treatments in a common garden. We then related these profiles to naturally occurring herbivore damage on whole plants in the garden. Herbivore damage was greater on native Lonicera, and chemical profiles and concentrations of selected putative defense compounds varied by species. Geographic origin was an inconsistent predictor of chemical variation in detected phenolics and iridoid glycosides (IGs). Overall, fertilization did not affect herbivore damage or measures of phenolics or IGs, but there were some fertilization effects within species. While we cannot conclude that non-natives were more chemically novel than native Lonicera species, chemical defense profiles and concentrations of specific compounds varied by species. Reduced attraction or deterrence of oviposition, specific direct resistance traits, or a combination of both may contribute to reduced herbivory and competitive advantages for non-native Lonicera in North America.
引入新栖息地的非本土植物会产生重大的生态影响。在许多情况下,即使它们与新的本土竞争植物所面对的潜在食草动物群落相同,但它们受到的损害通常更少。植物在叶片中产生次生代谢产物,这些次生代谢产物具有一系列防御功能,包括抵御食草动物和病原体。非生物因素如养分有效性会影响防御性状的表达,一些物种在低养分条件下会增强化学防御。忍冬属植物已知会产生多种这类次生代谢产物,但在北美,非本土忍冬属物种遭受的食草动物损害比同域分布的本土忍冬属物种要少。在本研究中,我们寻找非本土物种中生化新奇性的证据,并量化其与对食草动物抗性的关联。为了实现这一点,我们评估了在共同花园中高施肥和低施肥处理下生长的本土和非本土忍冬属植物叶片中的酚类和环烯醚萜苷谱。然后我们将这些谱与花园中整株植物自然发生的食草动物损害联系起来。本土忍冬受到的食草动物损害更大,所选假定防御化合物的化学谱和浓度因物种而异。地理起源并不是检测到的酚类和环烯醚萜苷(IGs)化学变异的一致预测因子。总体而言,施肥并未影响食草动物损害或酚类或IGs的测量,但在物种内存在一些施肥效应。虽然我们不能得出非本土植物比本土忍冬属植物在化学上更具新奇性的结论,但化学防御谱和特定化合物的浓度因物种而异。产卵吸引力或威慑力降低、特定的直接抗性性状或两者的组合可能有助于减少北美非本土忍冬的食草动物侵害并使其具有竞争优势。