Imahori Taichiro, Hosoda Kohkichi, Fujita Atsushi, Yamamoto Yusuke, Mizowaki Takashi, Miyake Shigeru, Kimura Hidehito, Kohta Masaaki, Kohmura Eiji
Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Feb;25(2):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
We investigated long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) in our institute to evaluate the outcomes of real-world practice in Japan.
Between August 2006 and July 2013, 203 consecutive carotid revascularizations with either CEA or CAS were performed in our institute. The initial treatment was regarded as the starting point in the cases of the patients who received treatment by bilateral carotid artery stenosis or retreatment. We assessed the long-term outcomes with survival analyses.
A total of 182 patients (CEA 111, CAS 71), including 86 symptomatic patients, were included in the current study with a mean follow-up period of 42.9 months. The periprocedural stroke/death/myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 3.6% for CEA and 5.6% for CAS groups (P = .71). Estimates of the 4-year event-free rate from the primary end point (the composite of any stroke, death, or MI within 30 days, and any ipsilateral stroke thereafter) using competing risk analysis were 3.6% for CEA and 7.1% for CAS (P = .156). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 4-year event-free rate from the secondary end point (the composite of any stroke, death, or MI within 30 days, and any stroke or death thereafter) were 13.8% for CEA and 19.1% for CAS (P = .072). Age was the only significant predictor for the primary end point. Both age and CAS were significant predictors for the secondary end point.
The current study on real-world practices demonstrated perioperative and long-term outcomes that were comparable to previous major studies of large numbers of patients.
我们在本机构调查了颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的长期疗效,以评估日本实际临床实践的结果。
2006年8月至2013年7月期间,本机构连续进行了203例采用CEA或CAS的颈动脉血运重建术。对于接受双侧颈动脉狭窄治疗或再次治疗的患者,初始治疗被视为起始点。我们通过生存分析评估长期疗效。
本研究共纳入182例患者(CEA组111例,CAS组71例),其中包括86例有症状的患者,平均随访期为42.9个月。CEA组围手术期卒中/死亡/心肌梗死(MI)发生率为3.6%,CAS组为5.6%(P = 0.71)。使用竞争风险分析得出的4年无事件发生率估计值,主要终点(30天内任何卒中、死亡或MI以及此后任何同侧卒中的复合终点)CEA组为3.6%,CAS组为7.1%(P = 0.156)。次要终点(30天内任何卒中、死亡或MI以及此后任何卒中或死亡的复合终点)的Kaplan-Meier 4年无事件发生率估计值,CEA组为13.8%,CAS组为19.1%(P = 0.072)。年龄是主要终点的唯一显著预测因素。年龄和CAS都是次要终点的显著预测因素。
当前关于实际临床实践的研究表明,围手术期和长期疗效与之前大量患者的主要研究结果相当。