• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非典型增生的范围和类型与乳腺癌风险:护士健康研究的最新进展

Breast cancer risk by extent and type of atypical hyperplasia: An update from the Nurses' Health Studies.

作者信息

Collins Laura C, Aroner Sarah A, Connolly James L, Colditz Graham A, Schnitt Stuart J, Tamimi Rulla M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Cancer. 2016 Feb 15;122(4):515-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29775. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.29775
PMID:26565738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4742394/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) on a benign breast biopsy specimen are at increased risk for the development of breast cancer. However, the relation between the type and extent of AH (atypical ductal hyperplasia [ADH] vs atypical lobular hyperplasia [ALH]) and the magnitude of the breast cancer risk is not well defined.

METHODS

A nested case-control study of benign breast disease and breast cancer risk was conducted. Women with breast cancer and prior benign breast biopsy findings (488 cases) were matched to women with prior benign breast biopsy findings who were free from breast cancer (1907 controls). Benign breast biopsy slides were reviewed and categorized as nonproliferative, proliferative without atypia, or AH (ADH or ALH). The number of foci of AH was also recorded.

RESULTS

Among women with ADH, the interrelation between the extent of atypia and breast cancer risk was not significant (odds ratio [OR] for 1 or 2 foci, 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-5.6; OR for ≥3 foci, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.1; P = .41). Similarly, although the risk with ALH was higher for those with ≥3 foci than for those with <3 foci, the difference was not statistically significant (OR for 1 or 2 foci, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.7-10.0; OR for ≥3 foci, 8.0; 95% CI, 4.5-14.2; P = .19).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that the extent of ADH or ALH does not significantly contribute to breast cancer risk. The lack of a significant dose-response relation between the extent and type of atypia and breast cancer risk suggests that it would be premature to use the extent of atypia to influence management decisions for women with ADH or ALH.

摘要

背景

乳腺良性活检标本中存在非典型增生(AH)的女性患乳腺癌的风险增加。然而,AH的类型和范围(非典型导管增生[ADH]与非典型小叶增生[ALH])与乳腺癌风险大小之间的关系尚未明确界定。

方法

开展了一项关于乳腺良性疾病与乳腺癌风险的巢式病例对照研究。患有乳腺癌且有既往乳腺良性活检结果的女性(488例病例)与有既往乳腺良性活检结果且无乳腺癌的女性(1907例对照)进行匹配。对乳腺良性活检切片进行复查,并分类为非增殖性、无异型增生的增殖性或AH(ADH或ALH)。还记录了AH的病灶数量。

结果

在患有ADH的女性中,异型增生程度与乳腺癌风险之间的相互关系不显著(1个或2个病灶的比值比[OR]为3.5;95%置信区间[CI]为2.2 - 5.6;≥3个病灶的OR为2.7;95% CI为1.4 - 5.1;P = 0.41)。同样,尽管≥3个病灶的ALH患者的风险高于<3个病灶的患者,但差异无统计学意义(1个或2个病灶的OR为5.2;95% CI为2.7 - 10.0;≥3个病灶的OR为8.0;95% CI为4.5 - 14.2;P = 0.19)。

结论

该分析表明,ADH或ALH的程度对乳腺癌风险没有显著影响。异型增生的程度和类型与乳腺癌风险之间缺乏显著的剂量反应关系,这表明利用异型增生程度来影响ADH或ALH女性的管理决策为时过早。

相似文献

1
Breast cancer risk by extent and type of atypical hyperplasia: An update from the Nurses' Health Studies.非典型增生的范围和类型与乳腺癌风险:护士健康研究的最新进展
Cancer. 2016 Feb 15;122(4):515-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29775. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
2
Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia: results from the Nurses' Health Study.根据非典型增生的组织学类型分析乳腺癌风险的大小及患侧性:护士健康研究的结果
Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):180-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22408.
3
Extent of atypical hyperplasia stratifies breast cancer risk in 2 independent cohorts of women.非典型增生程度在两组独立女性队列中对乳腺癌风险进行分层。
Cancer. 2016 Oct;122(19):2971-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30153. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
The influence of family history on breast cancer risk in women with biopsy-confirmed benign breast disease: results from the Nurses' Health Study.家族史对经活检确诊为良性乳腺疾病的女性患乳腺癌风险的影响:护士健康研究的结果
Cancer. 2006 Sep 15;107(6):1240-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22136.
5
Risk of breast cancer associated with atypical hyperplasia of lobular and ductal types.与小叶型和导管型非典型增生相关的乳腺癌风险。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 May;6(5):297-301.
6
Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study.通过其自然病史了解非典型增生的癌前潜能:一项纵向队列研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014 Feb;7(2):211-7. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0222. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
7
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided core needle breast biopsies resulting in high-risk histopathologic findings: upstage frequency and lesion characteristics.磁共振成像引导下的乳腺粗针活检导致高危组织病理学结果:分期上调频率和病变特征。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Jun;15(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
8
An analysis of breast cancer risk in women with single, multiple, and atypical papilloma.对患有单发、多发及非典型乳头状瘤的女性患乳腺癌风险的分析。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Jun;30(6):665-72. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200606000-00001.
9
Estrogen receptor expression in atypical hyperplasia: lack of association with breast cancer.非典型性增生中雌激素受体的表达:与乳腺癌无关。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Mar;4(3):435-44. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0242. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
10
Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia: an observational cohort study from the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease (BBD) cohort.非典型增生女性的乳腺钼靶密度与乳腺癌风险:一项来自梅奥诊所良性乳腺疾病(BBD)队列的观察性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3082-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in-situ, flat epithelial atypia, and future risk of developing breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.非典型导管或小叶增生、小叶原位癌、扁平上皮不典型增生,以及未来发生乳腺癌的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast. 2024 Dec;78:103807. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103807. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Atypia detected during breast screening and subsequent development of cancer: observational analysis of the Sloane atypia prospective cohort in England.在乳房筛查期间发现非典型性病变,随后发生癌症:英格兰斯隆非典型性前瞻性队列的观察性分析。
BMJ. 2024 Feb 1;384:e077039. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077039.
3
An update on intraductal and intralobular proliferative lesions of the breast.乳腺导管内及小叶内增生性病变的最新进展
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Aug 4;69(suppl 1):e2023S121. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.2023S121. eCollection 2023.
4
Breast screening atypia and subsequent development of cancer: protocol for an observational analysis of the Sloane database in England (Sloane atypia cohort study).乳腺筛查不典型增生及后续癌症发展:对英国斯隆数据库(斯隆不典型增生队列研究)进行观察性分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):e058050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058050.
5
Is Carboxypeptidase B1 a Prognostic Marker for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?羧肽酶B1是导管原位癌的预后标志物吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 6;13(7):1726. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071726.
6
Deep Learning Image Analysis of Benign Breast Disease to Identify Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer.深度学习对良性乳腺疾病的图像分析,以识别乳腺癌的后续风险。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jan 11;5(1). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa119. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Automated Quantitative Measures of Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution and Breast Cancer Risk.终末导管小叶单位萎缩的自动定量测量与乳腺癌风险。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Nov;29(11):2358-2368. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0723. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
8
Do Histopathology and Clinical Outcomes of Breast Atypia Vary by Race/Ethnicity?乳腺非典型增生的组织病理学和临床结果是否因种族/民族而异?
J Surg Res. 2020 Nov;255:205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.066. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
Deep learning assessment of breast terminal duct lobular unit involution: Towards automated prediction of breast cancer risk.深度学习评估乳腺终末导管小叶单位退化:实现乳腺癌风险的自动化预测。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0231653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231653. eCollection 2020.
10
The Regulatory Role of MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer.MicroRNAs 在乳腺癌中的调控作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 6;20(19):4940. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194940.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study.通过其自然病史了解非典型增生的癌前潜能:一项纵向队列研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014 Feb;7(2):211-7. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0222. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
2
Upgrade of high-risk breast lesions detected on mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.乳腺摄影检查中检出的高危乳腺病变的升级。
Am J Surg. 2014 Jan;207(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.014. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
3
The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis.家族史和组织学分层对良性乳腺疾病女性乳腺癌风险的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul;137(7):1053-60. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-0979-z. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
4
A multi-center prospective cohort study of benign breast disease and risk of subsequent breast cancer.多中心前瞻性队列研究良性乳腺疾病与后续乳腺癌风险。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Jun;21(6):821-8. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9508-7. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
5
Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo cohort study.非典型性女性乳腺癌风险分层:一项梅奥队列研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 1;25(19):2671-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0217. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
6
Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia: results from the Nurses' Health Study.根据非典型增生的组织学类型分析乳腺癌风险的大小及患侧性:护士健康研究的结果
Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):180-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22408.
7
The influence of family history on breast cancer risk in women with biopsy-confirmed benign breast disease: results from the Nurses' Health Study.家族史对经活检确诊为良性乳腺疾病的女性患乳腺癌风险的影响:护士健康研究的结果
Cancer. 2006 Sep 15;107(6):1240-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22136.
8
Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer.乳腺良性疾病与乳腺癌风险
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 21;353(3):229-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044383.
9
Histopathologic types of benign breast lesions and the risk of breast cancer: case-control study.乳腺良性病变的组织病理学类型与乳腺癌风险:病例对照研究
Am J Surg Pathol. 2002 Apr;26(4):421-30. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200204000-00003.
10
Benign breast changes and the risk for subsequent breast cancer: an update of the 1985 consensus statement. Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists.良性乳腺病变与后续患乳腺癌的风险:1985年共识声明的更新。美国病理学家学会癌症委员会
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 Dec;122(12):1053-5.