• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对患有单发、多发及非典型乳头状瘤的女性患乳腺癌风险的分析。

An analysis of breast cancer risk in women with single, multiple, and atypical papilloma.

作者信息

Lewis Jason T, Hartmann Lynn C, Vierkant Robert A, Maloney Shaun D, Shane Pankratz V, Allers Teresa M, Frost Marlene H, Visscher Daniel W

机构信息

Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Jun;30(6):665-72. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200606000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00000478-200606000-00001
PMID:16723843
Abstract

Breast papillomas may be single or multiple and associated with atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasias (ADH/ALH). The risk of breast carcinoma development in patients with papillomas, particularly those with multiple or atypical lesions, is incompletely defined. Fibrocystic lesions were histopathologically classified in a benign breast disease cohort of 9155 who underwent biopsy from 1967 to 1991, with papilloma assessment in 9108. Individuals with papillomas (N=480) were classified into 4 groups: single papilloma (SP, N=372), single papilloma with ADH or ALH (SP+A, N=54), multiple (>5) papillomas (MP, N=41), and multiple papillomas with ADH or ALH (MP+A, N=13). Those without papillomas were classified as nonproliferative (NP, N=6053), proliferative without atypia (PDWA, N=2308), and ADH/ALH [atypical hyperplasia (AH), N=267]. The relative risk of cancer development within our cohort was compared to that expected in the general population using standardized incidence ratios. The relative risk of breast cancer development associated with SP [2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.81] was greater than NP (1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.42) but similar to PDWA (1.90, 95% CI 1.66-2.16). The risk associated with SP+A (5.11, 95% CI 2.64-8.92) was highly elevated but not substantively different than atypical hyperplasia (4.17, 95% CI 3.10-5.50). Patients with MP are at increased risk compared with PDWA or SP (3.01, 95% CI 1.10-6.55), particularly those with MP+A (7.01, 95% CI 1.91-17.97). There was a marginal increase in breast cancer risk (16%) among patients with proliferative disease if a papilloma was present, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.29). The observed frequency of ipsilateral (vs. contralateral) breast cancer development in papilloma subsets was not significantly different than other patient groups. We conclude that SP imparts a cancer risk similar to conventional proliferative fibrocystic change. The presence of papilloma in, or associated with, atypia does not modify the risk connotation of ADH/ALH overall. MP constitutes a proliferative breast disease subset having unique clinical and biologic behavior.

摘要

乳腺乳头状瘤可以是单发或多发的,并与非典型导管或小叶增生(ADH/ALH)相关。乳头状瘤患者,尤其是那些有多发或非典型病变的患者,发生乳腺癌的风险尚未完全明确。在1967年至1991年接受活检的9155例良性乳腺疾病队列中,对纤维囊性病变进行了组织病理学分类,其中9108例进行了乳头状瘤评估。有乳头状瘤的个体(N = 480)被分为4组:单发乳头状瘤(SP,N = 372)、伴有ADH或ALH的单发乳头状瘤(SP + A,N = 54)、多发(>5个)乳头状瘤(MP,N = 41)以及伴有ADH或ALH的多发乳头状瘤(MP + A,N = 13)。没有乳头状瘤的个体被分为非增殖性(NP,N = 6053)、无非典型性的增殖性(PDWA,N = 2308)和ADH/ALH[非典型增生(AH),N = 267]。使用标准化发病率比,将我们队列中癌症发生的相对风险与一般人群中预期的风险进行比较。与SP相关的乳腺癌发生相对风险[2.04,95%置信区间(CI)1.43 - 2.81]高于NP(1.28,95% CI 1.16 - 1.42),但与PDWA(1.90,95% CI 1.66 - 2.16)相似。与SP + A相关的风险(5.11,95% CI 2.64 - 8.92)显著升高,但与非典型增生(4.17,95% CI 3.10 - 5.50)相比没有实质性差异。与PDWA或SP相比,MP患者的风险增加(3.01,95% CI 1.10 - 6.55),尤其是那些MP + A患者(7.01,95% CI 1.91 - 17.97)。如果存在乳头状瘤,增殖性疾病患者的乳腺癌风险有轻微增加(16%),但未达到统计学意义(P = 0.29)。乳头状瘤亚组中同侧(与对侧相比)乳腺癌发生的观察频率与其他患者组没有显著差异。我们得出结论,SP赋予的癌症风险与传统的增殖性纤维囊性改变相似。在非典型性中存在或与之相关的乳头状瘤总体上不会改变ADH/ALH的风险内涵。MP构成了具有独特临床和生物学行为的增殖性乳腺疾病亚组。

相似文献

1
An analysis of breast cancer risk in women with single, multiple, and atypical papilloma.对患有单发、多发及非典型乳头状瘤的女性患乳腺癌风险的分析。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Jun;30(6):665-72. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200606000-00001.
2
Clinicopathologic analysis of breast lesions associated with multiple papillomas.与多发性乳头状瘤相关的乳腺病变的临床病理分析
Hum Pathol. 2003 Mar;34(3):234-9. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2003.25.
3
Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study.通过其自然病史了解非典型增生的癌前潜能:一项纵向队列研究。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014 Feb;7(2):211-7. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0222. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
4
Breast cancer risk by extent and type of atypical hyperplasia: An update from the Nurses' Health Studies.非典型增生的范围和类型与乳腺癌风险:护士健康研究的最新进展
Cancer. 2016 Feb 15;122(4):515-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29775. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
5
Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia: results from the Nurses' Health Study.根据非典型增生的组织学类型分析乳腺癌风险的大小及患侧性:护士健康研究的结果
Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):180-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22408.
6
Impact of concurrent proliferative high-risk lesions on the risk of ipsilateral breast carcinoma recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma development in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy.同时存在的增殖性高危病变对接受保乳治疗的导管原位癌患者同侧乳腺癌复发风险及对侧乳腺癌发生风险的影响。
Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;106(1):42-50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21571.
7
Papillary lesions of the breast: To excise or observe?乳腺乳头状病变:切除还是观察?
Breast J. 2018 May;24(3):350-355. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12907. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
8
Extent of atypical hyperplasia stratifies breast cancer risk in 2 independent cohorts of women.非典型增生程度在两组独立女性队列中对乳腺癌风险进行分层。
Cancer. 2016 Oct;122(19):2971-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30153. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Flat epithelial atypia and risk of breast cancer: A Mayo cohort study.扁平上皮异型增生与乳腺癌风险:一项梅奥队列研究。
Cancer. 2015 May 15;121(10):1548-55. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29243. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Breast papillomas with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a clinicopathologic study.伴有非典型导管增生的乳腺乳头状瘤:一项临床病理研究。
Hum Pathol. 1996 Nov;27(11):1231-8. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90320-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided seven-gauge vacuum-assisted excision for benign breast lesions: A single expert surgeon experience.超声引导下7号真空辅助切除治疗乳腺良性病变:单中心专家经验
Ultrasound. 2025 Feb 28:1742271X241305025. doi: 10.1177/1742271X241305025.
2
Clinical Radiologic Analysis of 2964 Papillary Breast Lesions.2964例乳腺乳头状病变的临床放射学分析
Breast J. 2024 Dec 24;2024:5639017. doi: 10.1155/tbj/5639017. eCollection 2024.
3
Benign Breast Disease and Breast Cancer Risk in the Percutaneous Biopsy Era.经皮活检时代的良性乳腺疾病与乳腺癌风险。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Feb 1;159(2):193-201. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6382.
4
Maximum intensity projection based on high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of breast tumors.基于高帧率对比增强超声的最大强度投影用于乳腺肿瘤的鉴别诊断。
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 30;13:1274716. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1274716. eCollection 2023.
5
The impact of nurse navigation on timeliness to treatment for benign high-risk breast pathology.护士导航对良性高危乳腺病理治疗及时性的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Nov;202(1):129-137. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07049-0. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
6
Prevalence, Impact, and Diagnostic Challenges of Benign Breast Disease: A Narrative Review.良性乳腺疾病的患病率、影响及诊断挑战:一项叙述性综述
Int J Womens Health. 2023 May 18;15:765-778. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S351095. eCollection 2023.
7
The effect of delay of excisional biopsy on upstage rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, and radial scar.延迟切除术对非典型导管增生、平坦上皮不典型增生、导管内乳头状瘤和放射状瘢痕的升级率的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):527-534. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06745-7. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
8
Breast cancer risk in papilloma patients: Osteopontin splice variants indicate prognosis.乳头瘤病患者的乳腺癌风险:骨桥蛋白剪接变异体预示预后。
Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 29;24(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01561-9.
9
Multiple Papillomas of the Breast: A Review of Current Evidence and Challenges.乳腺多发性乳头状瘤:当前证据与挑战综述
J Imaging. 2022 Jul 13;8(7):198. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8070198.
10
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in detection and surgical treatment of breast intraductal papillomas.磁共振成像在乳腺导管内乳头状瘤检测及外科治疗中的作用
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;8(2):635-646. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.03.27.