Calandra-Buonaura Giovanna, Doria Andrea, Lopane Giovanna, Guaraldi Pietro, Capellari Sabina, Martinelli Paolo, Cortelli Pietro, Contin Manuela
IRCCS, Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, c/o Padiglione G, Ospedale Bellaria, Via Altura 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123, Bologna, Italy.
J Neurol. 2016 Feb;263(2):250-256. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7961-7. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
The differential diagnosis between multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P) and Parkinson's disease (PD) may be challenging at disease onset. Levodopa responsiveness helps distinguish the two groups, but studies evaluating this issue using objective standardized tests are scanty. We retrospectively examined the extent of levodopa response by an objective kinetic-dynamic test in a series of patients prospectively followed up for a parkinsonian syndrome and eventually diagnosed as MSA-P or PD. Sixteen MSA-P and 31 PD patients under chronic levodopa therapy received a first morning fasting dose of levodopa/benserazide (100/25 mg) or levodopa/carbidopa (125/12.5 or 100/25 mg) and underwent simultaneous serial assessments of plasma levodopa concentration and alternate finger tapping frequency up to 3 h post dosing. The main levodopa pharmacodynamic variables were the maximum percentage increase in tapping frequency over baseline values (ΔTapmax %) and the area under the tapping effect-time curve (AUCTap). Levodopa pharmacokinetics did not show significant differences between MSA-P and PD, whereas both the magnitude and overall extent of levodopa tapping effect were markedly reduced in the MSA-P group (p < 0.001). The combined use of specific cut-off values for both the main pharmacodynamic variables, ΔTapmax % <20% and AUCTap <1900 [(tapping/min)·min], correctly discriminated 15 out of 16 MSA-P patients from PD patients. A combined estimation of these pharmacodynamic variables after a subacute low levodopa dose may be a simple and practical clinical tool to aid the differential diagnosis between MSA-P and PD.
在疾病发作时,以帕金森综合征为主的多系统萎缩(MSA-P)与帕金森病(PD)之间的鉴别诊断可能具有挑战性。左旋多巴反应性有助于区分这两组,但使用客观标准化测试评估该问题的研究较少。我们通过客观的动力学-动态测试,对一系列因帕金森综合征接受前瞻性随访并最终诊断为MSA-P或PD的患者,回顾性地研究了左旋多巴反应的程度。16例接受慢性左旋多巴治疗的MSA-P患者和31例PD患者在早晨空腹时接受了第一剂左旋多巴/苄丝肼(100/25毫克)或左旋多巴/卡比多巴(125/12.5或100/25毫克),并在给药后3小时内同时连续评估血浆左旋多巴浓度和交替手指敲击频率。主要的左旋多巴药效学变量是敲击频率相对于基线值的最大百分比增加(ΔTapmax%)和敲击效应-时间曲线下面积(AUCTap)。左旋多巴药代动力学在MSA-P和PD之间没有显著差异,而MSA-P组中左旋多巴敲击效应的幅度和总体程度均明显降低(p<0.001)。将两个主要药效学变量的特定临界值(ΔTapmax%<20%和AUCTap<1900[(敲击次数/分钟)·分钟])结合使用,能正确区分16例MSA-P患者中的15例与PD患者。在给予亚急性低剂量左旋多巴后,对这些药效学变量进行联合评估可能是一种简单实用的临床工具,有助于MSA-P和PD之间的鉴别诊断。