IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOC Clinica Neurologica Rete Metropolitana NEUROMET, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (DiBiNeM), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Aug;29(8):2232-2240. doi: 10.1111/ene.15347. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
Stridor treatment in multiple system atrophy (MSA) mainly comprises tracheostomy or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), but guidelines for the use of these treatments are lacking. The aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of stridor treatment in an MSA cohort.
This is a retrospective and prospective monocentric cohort study including MSA patients evaluated at least once a year during the disease course. Stridor was video-polysomnography confirmed. The time of stridor treatment (CPAP or tracheostomy) and latency from stridor onset were collected. Survival and predictors of survival were calculated.
A total of 182 (107 males, mean age at disease onset 57.3 ± 8.4 years) MSA patients were included in the study; 141 were deceased at the time of study. Of the total sample, 75 patients were diagnosed with stridor: 22 patients were treated with tracheostomy and 29 with CPAP, whilst 24 patients did not receive treatment. Treatment with tracheostomy showed longer survival compared with both treatment with CPAP or no treatment (incidence rate of death 12 vs. 21 vs. 23 per 100 person-years, respectively). Tracheostomy remained an independent factor associated with longer survival (hazard ratio 0.38, p = 0.029), also after adjustment for other confounders and latency for stridor treatment.
This is the largest monocentric and long-term follow-up study comparing survival between tracheostomy and CPAP in MSA patients with stridor. Treatment with tracheostomy showed longer survival compared with both treatment with CPAP or no treatment. A careful multidisciplinary approach is required for the management of MSA patients with stridor.
多系统萎缩(MSA)患者的喘鸣治疗主要包括气管切开术或持续气道正压通气(CPAP),但缺乏这些治疗方法的使用指南。本研究旨在评估喘鸣治疗在 MSA 患者中的预测价值。
这是一项回顾性和前瞻性的单中心队列研究,纳入了在疾病过程中至少每年评估一次的 MSA 患者。喘鸣通过视频多导睡眠图(PSG)确认。收集喘鸣治疗(CPAP 或气管切开术)的时间和喘鸣发作的潜伏期。计算生存和生存预测因素。
本研究共纳入 182 例(107 例男性,发病时平均年龄 57.3±8.4 岁)MSA 患者;研究时 141 例患者已死亡。在总样本中,75 例患者被诊断为喘鸣:22 例接受气管切开术治疗,29 例接受 CPAP 治疗,24 例未接受治疗。与 CPAP 治疗或未治疗相比,气管切开术治疗的生存时间更长(死亡率发生率分别为 12、21 和 23 例/100 人年)。气管切开术仍然是与生存时间延长相关的独立因素(风险比 0.38,p=0.029),即使在调整其他混杂因素和喘鸣治疗潜伏期后也是如此。
这是一项最大的单中心、长期随访研究,比较了 MSA 喘鸣患者中气管切开术和 CPAP 治疗的生存情况。与 CPAP 治疗或未治疗相比,气管切开术治疗的生存时间更长。需要采用多学科综合方法来管理 MSA 喘鸣患者。