• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立丧亲之痛支持方面的社区能力。

Building Community Capacity in Bereavement Support.

作者信息

Breen Lauren J, Aoun Samar M, Rumbold Bruce, McNamara Beverley, Howting Denise A, Mancini Vincent

机构信息

1 Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

2 La Trobe University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Apr;34(3):275-281. doi: 10.1177/1049909115615568. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1177/1049909115615568
PMID:26566928
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most bereaved people do not require specialist intervention, yet building community capacity in providing bereavement support is underdeveloped. While family caregivers indicate a need for more information about bereavement, there is little evidence to guide what this information might contain.

OBJECTIVE

The study's purpose was to inform bereavement support by determining the advice people bereaved through expected deaths in palliative care have for others in that situation.

DESIGN

Four funeral providers posted a questionnaire to previous clients who had used their services 6 to 24 months prior and 678 bereaved people responded.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The sample size for this study comprised 265 bereaved people whose relative used palliative care services.

MEASUREMENTS

The questionnaire comprised 82 questions about caregiving, bereavement support, current bereavement-related distress, and 2 open-ended questions concerning their bereavement, one of them on advice they have to other people in the same situation.

RESULTS

Family caregivers (n = 140) of people who received palliative care responded to the open-ended question about advice for others. An open content analysis yielded 3 themes-preparations for bereavement, utilizing social networks, and strategies for dealing with grief.

CONCLUSIONS

Bereaved family caregivers' experiential knowledge can be harnessed to progress the development of bereavement care strategies for the good of the community. These responses could be incorporated into information brochures, posters, and other community education avenues in order to upskill palliative care bereavement volunteers and the wider community so that bereaved family caregivers are best supported.

摘要

背景

大多数失去亲人的人不需要专业干预,但社区提供丧亲之痛支持的能力建设尚不完善。虽然家庭照顾者表示需要更多关于丧亲之痛的信息,但几乎没有证据能指导这些信息可能包含哪些内容。

目的

本研究的目的是通过确定在姑息治疗中因预期死亡而失去亲人的人对处于相同情况的其他人的建议,为丧亲之痛支持提供参考。

设计

四家葬礼服务提供商向6至24个月前使用过其服务的前客户发放了问卷,678名失去亲人的人做出了回应。

设置/参与者:本研究的样本量包括265名其亲属使用过姑息治疗服务的失去亲人的人。

测量

问卷包括82个关于照顾、丧亲之痛支持、当前与丧亲之痛相关的痛苦的问题,以及2个关于他们丧亲之痛的开放式问题,其中一个是关于他们对处于相同情况的其他人的建议。

结果

接受姑息治疗者的家庭照顾者(n = 140)回答了关于给他人建议的开放式问题。开放式内容分析产生了3个主题——丧亲之痛的准备、利用社交网络以及应对悲伤的策略。

结论

可以利用失去亲人的家庭照顾者的经验知识,推动丧亲之痛护理策略的发展,以造福社区。这些回答可以纳入信息手册、海报和其他社区教育途径,以使姑息治疗丧亲之痛志愿者和更广泛的社区提高技能,从而为失去亲人的家庭照顾者提供最佳支持。

相似文献

1
Building Community Capacity in Bereavement Support.建立丧亲之痛支持方面的社区能力。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Apr;34(3):275-281. doi: 10.1177/1049909115615568. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
2
Bereavement support for family caregivers: The gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care.为家庭照护者提供的哀伤支持:姑息治疗中指南与实践的差距。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 4;12(10):e0184750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184750. eCollection 2017.
3
Caring for bereaved family caregivers: analyzing the context of care.关爱失去亲人的家庭护理人员:分析护理背景。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Jun;12(3):501-6. doi: 10.1188/08.CJON.501-506.
4
What sources of bereavement support are perceived helpful by bereaved people and why? Empirical evidence for the compassionate communities approach.丧亲者认为哪些丧亲支持来源是有帮助的,原因是什么?富有同情心的社区方法的实证证据。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1378-1388. doi: 10.1177/0269216318774995. Epub 2018 May 14.
5
The meaning and experience of bereavement support: A qualitative interview study of bereaved family caregivers.丧亲支持的意义和体验:一项对丧亲家庭照顾者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Aug;16(4):396-405. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000475. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
What is the role of community at the end of life for people dying in advanced age? A qualitative study with bereaved family carers.在生命末期,社区对于高龄死亡者的作用是什么?一项对丧亲家属照顾者的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):268-275. doi: 10.1177/0269216317735248. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Bereaved Caregivers to Patients With High-Grade Glioma: A Qualitative Explorative Study.高级别胶质瘤患者的丧亲照料者:一项定性探索性研究。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2018 Apr;50(2):94-99. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000348.
8
The Impact of Supporting Family Caregivers Before Bereavement on Outcomes After Bereavement: Adequacy of End-of-Life Support and Achievement of Preferred Place of Death.在丧亲前支持家庭照顾者对丧亲后结局的影响:临终支持的充分性和实现期望的死亡地点。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):368-378. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
"How Long Can I Carry On?" The Need for Palliative Care in Parkinson's Disease: A Qualitative Study from the Perspective of Bereaved Family Caregivers.“我还能撑多久?”——从帕金森病丧亲照料者的角度出发对姑息治疗需求的定性研究。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10(4):1631-1642. doi: 10.3233/JPD-191884.
10
Navigating the Liminal Space: Trauma, Transition, and Connection in Bereaved Carers' Experiences of Specialist Palliative Care in Western Sydney.穿越临界空间:悉尼西部丧亲照护者在专科姑息治疗经历中的创伤、转变与联系
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2018 Apr-Sep;14(2-3):225-239. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2018.1495140.

引用本文的文献

1
Grief and grief support needs in Canada: A mixed methods protocol.加拿大的悲伤情绪与悲伤支持需求:一项混合方法研究方案。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 May 9;19:26323524251334180. doi: 10.1177/26323524251334180. eCollection 2025.
2
Support needs of Australians bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey study.支持在 COVID-19 大流行期间丧偶的澳大利亚人的需求:一项横断面调查研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0304025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304025. eCollection 2024.
3
Engaging and supporting the public on the topic of grief and bereavement: an evaluation of Good Grief Festival.
就悲伤与丧亲之痛这一主题吸引并支持公众:对“美好悲伤节”的评估
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Jul 30;17:26323524231189523. doi: 10.1177/26323524231189523. eCollection 2023.
4
No time to grieve: Inuit loss experiences and grief practices in Nunavik, Quebec.无暇悲伤:魁北克努纳武特因纽特人的丧失经历与悲伤实践
Transcult Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;60(6):917-928. doi: 10.1177/13634615221135423. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Support needs and barriers to accessing support: Baseline results of a mixed-methods national survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic.支持需求和获取支持的障碍:COVID-19 大流行期间丧亲人群的混合方法全国调查的基线结果。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1985-1997. doi: 10.1177/02692163211043372. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
Harnessing social support for bereavement now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间及之后利用社会支持应对丧亲之痛。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2021 Feb 17;15:2632352420988009. doi: 10.1177/2632352420988009. eCollection 2021.
7
The impact of bereavement support on wellbeing: a comparative study between Australia and Ireland.丧亲之痛支持对幸福感的影响:澳大利亚与爱尔兰的比较研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2020 Jul 27;14:2632352420935132. doi: 10.1177/2632352420935132. eCollection 2020.
8
Matching response to need: What makes social networks fit for providing bereavement support?匹配需求的响应:是什么让社交网络适合提供丧亲支持?
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213367. eCollection 2019.
9
Bereavement support for family caregivers: The gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care.为家庭照护者提供的哀伤支持:姑息治疗中指南与实践的差距。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 4;12(10):e0184750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184750. eCollection 2017.