Suppr超能文献

为家庭照护者提供的哀伤支持:姑息治疗中指南与实践的差距。

Bereavement support for family caregivers: The gap between guidelines and practice in palliative care.

作者信息

Aoun Samar M, Rumbold Bruce, Howting Denise, Bolleter Amanda, Breen Lauren J

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Palliative Care Unit, Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 4;12(10):e0184750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184750. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standards for bereavement care propose that support should be matched to risk and need. However, studies in many countries demonstrate that palliative care services continue to adopt a generic approach in offering support to bereaved families.

OBJECTIVE

To identify patterns of bereavement support in palliative care services based upon the experience of bereaved people from a population based survey and in relation to clinical practice guidelines.

DESIGN

An anonymous postal survey collected information from clients of six funeral providers in four Australian states (2014-15), 6 to 24 months after the death of their family member or friend, with 1,139 responding. Responses from 506 bereaved relatives of people who had terminal illnesses were analysed. Of these, 298 had used palliative care services and 208 had not.

RESULTS

More people with cancer (64%) had received palliative care in comparison to other illnesses such as heart disease, dementia and organ failure (4-10%). The support for family caregivers before and after their relative's death was not considered optimal. Only 39.4% of the bereaved reported being specifically asked about their emotional/ psychological distress pre-bereavement, and just half of the bereaved perceived they had enough support from palliative care services. Half of the bereaved had a follow up contact from the service at 3-6 weeks, and a quarter had a follow-up at 6 months. Their qualitative feedback underlined the limited helpfulness of the blanket approach to bereavement support, which was often described as "not personal" or "generic", or "just standard practice".

CONCLUSIONS

Timeliness and consistency of relationship is crucial to building rapport and trust in the service's ability to help at post-bereavement as well as a focus on the specific rather than the generic needs of the bereaved. In light of these limitations, palliative care services might do better investing their efforts principally in assessing and supporting family caregivers during the pre-bereavement period and developing community capacity and referral pathways for bereavement care. Our findings suggest that bereavement support in Australian palliative care services has only a tenuous relationship with guidelines and assessment tools, a conclusion also drawn in studies from other countries, emphasizing the international implications of our study.

摘要

背景

丧亲照护标准提出,支持应与风险和需求相匹配。然而,许多国家的研究表明,姑息治疗服务在为丧亲家庭提供支持时仍采用通用方法。

目的

根据基于人群调查中丧亲者的经历以及与临床实践指南的关系,确定姑息治疗服务中的丧亲支持模式。

设计

一项匿名邮寄调查收集了来自澳大利亚四个州的六家丧葬服务提供商的客户在其家庭成员或朋友去世6至24个月后的信息(2014 - 2015年),共收到1139份回复。对506名绝症患者的丧亲亲属的回复进行了分析。其中,298人使用过姑息治疗服务,208人未使用过。

结果

与心脏病、痴呆症和器官衰竭等其他疾病(4 - 10%)相比,更多癌症患者(64%)接受了姑息治疗。对家庭照顾者在其亲属去世前后的支持被认为并不理想。只有39.4%的丧亲者报告在丧亲前被专门询问过他们的情绪/心理困扰,只有一半的丧亲者认为他们从姑息治疗服务中得到了足够的支持。一半的丧亲者在3 - 6周时得到了服务机构的跟进联系,四分之一的丧亲者在6个月时得到了跟进。他们的定性反馈强调了通用的丧亲支持方法的帮助有限,这种方法通常被描述为“不针对个人”或“通用的”,或“只是标准做法”。

结论

关系的及时性和一致性对于在丧亲后建立融洽关系以及信任服务机构的帮助能力至关重要,同时要关注丧亲者的具体而非通用需求。鉴于这些局限性,姑息治疗服务机构可能最好将精力主要投入到在丧亲前评估和支持家庭照顾者,以及发展社区丧亲照护能力和转诊途径上。我们的研究结果表明,澳大利亚姑息治疗服务中的丧亲支持与指南和评估工具的关系很薄弱,其他国家的研究也得出了这一结论,强调了我们研究的国际影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8c/5627900/ba978309f086/pone.0184750.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验