Burton Matthew, Habtamu Esmael, Ho Derek, Gower Emily W
International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK, WC1E 7HT.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 13;2015(11):CD004008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004008.pub3.
Trachoma is the leading infectious cause of blindness. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends eliminating trachomatous blindness through the SAFE strategy: Surgery for trichiasis, Antibiotic treatment, Facial cleanliness and Environmental hygiene. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2003, and previously updated in 2006.
To assess the effects of interventions for trachomatous trichiasis for people living in endemic settings.
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2015, Issue 4), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to May 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2015), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 7 May 2015. We searched the reference lists of included studies to identify further potentially relevant studies. We also contacted authors for details of other relevant studies.
We included randomised trials of any intervention intended to treat trachomatous trichiasis.
Three review authors independently selected and assessed the trials, including the risk of bias. We contacted trial authors for missing data when necessary. Our primary outcome was post-operative trichiasis which was defined as any lash touching the globe at three months, one year or two years after surgery.
Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria with 8586 participants. Most of the studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of the studies were of a low or unclear risk of bias.Five studies compared different surgical interventions. Most surgical interventions were performed by non-physician technicians. These trials suggest the most effective surgery is full-thickness incision of the tarsal plate and rotation of the terminal tarsal strip. Pooled data from two studies suggested that the bilamellar rotation was more effective than unilamellar rotation (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.50). Use of a lid clamp reduced lid contour abnormalities (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.98) and granuloma formation (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.97). Absorbable sutures gave comparable outcomes to silk sutures (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.20) and were associated with less frequent granuloma formation (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.99). Epilation was less effective at preventing eyelashes from touching the globe than surgery for mild trichiasis, but had comparable results for vision and corneal change. Peri-operative azithromycin reduced post-operative trichiasis; however, the estimate of effect was imprecise and compatible with no effect or increased trichiasis (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.14; 1954 eyes; 3 studies). Community-based surgery when compared to health centres increased uptake with comparable outcomes. Surgery performed by ophthalmologists and integrated eye care workers was comparable. Adverse events were typically infrequent or mild and included rare postoperative infections, eyelid contour abnormalities and conjunctival granulomas.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No trials were designed to evaluate whether the interventions for trichiasis prevent blindness as an outcome; however, several found modest improvement in vision following intervention. Certain interventions have been shown to be more effective at eliminating trichiasis. Full-thickness incision of the tarsal plate and rotation of the lash-bearing lid margin was found to be the best technique and is preferably delivered in the community. Surgery may be carried out by an ophthalmologist or a trained ophthalmic assistant. Surgery performed with silk or absorbable sutures gave comparable results. Post-operative azithromycin was found to improve outcomes where overall recurrence was low.
沙眼是导致失明的主要传染性病因。世界卫生组织(WHO)建议通过SAFE策略消除沙眼性盲:倒睫手术、抗生素治疗、面部清洁和环境卫生。这是Cochrane系统评价的更新版本,该评价首次发表于2003年,此前于2006年进行过更新。
评估针对流行地区人群沙眼性倒睫干预措施的效果。
我们检索了Cochrane中心对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)(其中包含Cochrane眼科和视力组试验注册库)(2015年第4期)、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid MEDLINE在研及其他未索引的引用文献、Ovid MEDLINE每日更新、Ovid OLDMEDLINE(1946年1月至2015年5月)、EMBASE(1980年1月至2015年5月)、国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(ISRCTN registry)(www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch)、ClinicalTrials.gov(www.clinicaltrials.gov)以及WHO国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)(www.who.int/ictrp/search/en)。我们在电子检索试验时未使用任何日期或语言限制。我们最后一次检索电子数据库的时间为2015年5月7日。我们检索了纳入研究的参考文献列表,以识别其他潜在相关研究。我们还联系了作者获取其他相关研究的详细信息。
我们纳入了旨在治疗沙眼性倒睫的任何干预措施的随机试验。
三位综述作者独立选择并评估试验,包括偏倚风险。必要时我们联系试验作者获取缺失数据。我们的主要结局是术后倒睫,定义为术后三个月、一年或两年时任何睫毛触及眼球。
13项研究符合纳入标准,共8586名参与者。大多数研究在撒哈拉以南非洲进行。大多数研究的偏倚风险较低或不明确。五项研究比较了不同的手术干预措施。大多数手术干预由非医师技术人员进行。这些试验表明最有效的手术是睑板全层切开和睑板末端条带旋转。两项研究的汇总数据表明双层旋转比单层旋转更有效(比值比[OR]0.29,95%置信区间[CI]0.16至0.50)。使用眼睑夹可减少眼睑轮廓异常(OR 0.65,95% CI 0.44至0.98)和肉芽肿形成(OR 0.67,95% CI 0.46至0.97)。可吸收缝线与丝线缝线的效果相当(OR 0.90,95% CI 0.68至1.20),且肉芽肿形成频率较低(OR 0.63,95% CI 0.40至0.99)。对于轻度倒睫,拔毛在防止睫毛触及眼球方面不如手术有效,但在视力和角膜改变方面结果相当。围手术期使用阿奇霉素可减少术后倒睫;然而,效果估计不精确,与无效果或倒睫增加相符(OR 0.85,95% CI 0.63至1.14;1954只眼;3项研究)。与在健康中心进行手术相比,基于社区的手术提高了接受率且结果相当。眼科医生和综合眼保健工作者进行的手术效果相当。不良事件通常很少见或较轻微,包括罕见的术后感染、眼睑轮廓异常和结膜肉芽肿。
没有试验旨在评估倒睫干预措施是否能预防失明这一结局;然而,一些研究发现干预后视力有适度改善。已证明某些干预措施在消除倒睫方面更有效。睑板全层切开和含睫毛的睑缘旋转被认为是最佳技术,最好在社区进行。手术可由眼科医生或训练有素的眼科助理进行。使用丝线或可吸收缝线进行的手术结果相当。发现术后使用阿奇霉素可在总体复发率较低的情况下改善结局。