Jiang Luo, Hou Rui, Gong Ting-Ting, Wu Qi-Jun
Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 16;5:16693. doi: 10.1038/srep16693.
Epidemiological studies have provided controversial evidence of the association between dietary fat intake and endometrial cancer (EC) risk. To address this inconsistency, we conducted this dose-response meta-analysis by total dietary fat intake, based on epidemiological studies published up to the end of June 2015 identified from PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Two authors (RH and Q-JW) independently performed the eligibility evaluation and data extraction. All differences were resolved by discussion with the third investigator (LJ). Random-effects models were used to estimate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, the search yielded 16 studies (6 cohort and 10 case-control studies) that involved a total of 7556 EC cases and 563,781 non-cases. The summary RR for EC for each 30 g/day increment intake was 0.98 (95%CI = 0.95-1.001; I(2) = 0%; n = 11) for total dietary fat. Non-significant results were observed in plant-based fat (summary RR = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.94-1.18; I(2) = 0%; n = 5) and animal-based fat (summary RR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.92-1.36; I(2) = 85.0%; n = 6). Additionally, the null associations were observed in almost all the subgroup and sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, findings of the present meta-analysis suggested a lack of association between total dietary fat intake and EC risk. Further studies, especially prospective designed studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
流行病学研究提供了关于膳食脂肪摄入与子宫内膜癌(EC)风险之间关联的有争议证据。为了解决这种不一致性,我们基于截至2015年6月底从PubMed、EMBASE和科学网检索到的流行病学研究,按膳食总脂肪摄入量进行了这项剂量反应荟萃分析。两位作者(RH和Q-JW)独立进行了合格性评估和数据提取。所有分歧都通过与第三位研究者(LJ)讨论解决。采用随机效应模型估计汇总相对风险(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。总体而言,检索得到16项研究(6项队列研究和10项病例对照研究),共涉及7556例EC病例和563,781例非病例。膳食总脂肪每增加30克/天摄入,EC的汇总RR为0.98(95%CI = 0.95 - 1.001;I(2)=0%;n = 11)。植物性脂肪(汇总RR = 1.05,95%CI = 0.94 - 1.18;I(2)=0%;n = 5)和动物性脂肪(汇总RR = 1.17,95%CI = 0.92 - 1.36;I(2)=85.0%;n = 6)未观察到显著结果。此外,在几乎所有亚组和敏感性分析中均观察到无关联。总之,本荟萃分析结果表明膳食总脂肪摄入与EC风险之间缺乏关联。需要进一步研究,尤其是前瞻性设计研究来证实我们的发现。