Freedberg Michael, Schacherer Jonathan, Hazeltine Eliot
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program, University of Iowa.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 May;42(5):786-803. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000201. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
Reward has been shown to change behavior as a result of incentive learning (by motivating the individual to increase their effort) and instrumental learning (by increasing the frequency of a particular behavior). However, Palminteri et al. (2011) demonstrated that reward can also improve the incidental learning of a motor skill even when participants are unaware of the relationship between the reward and the motor act. Nonetheless, it remains unknown whether these effects of reward are the indirect results of manipulations of top-down factors. To identify the locus of the benefit associated with rewarded incidental learning, we used a chord-learning task (Seibel, 1963) in which the correct performance of some chords was consistently rewarded with points necessary to complete the block whereas the correct performance of other chords was not rewarded. Following training, participants performed a transfer phase without reward and then answered a questionnaire to assess explicit awareness about the rewards. Experiment 1 revealed that rewarded chords were performed more quickly than unrewarded chords, and there was little awareness about the relationship between chords and reward. Experiment 2 obtained similar findings with simplified responses to show that the advantage for rewarded stimulus combinations reflected more efficient binding of stimulus-response (S-R) associations, rather than a response bias for rewarded associations or improved motor learning. These results indicate that rewards can be used to significantly improve the learning of S-R associations without directly manipulating top-down factors. (PsycINFO Database Record
奖励已被证明会因激励学习(通过激励个体增加努力)和工具性学习(通过增加特定行为的频率)而改变行为。然而,帕尔明泰里等人(2011年)证明,即使参与者没有意识到奖励与运动行为之间的关系,奖励也能提高运动技能的附带学习。尽管如此,奖励的这些效果是否是自上而下因素操纵的间接结果仍然未知。为了确定与奖励性附带学习相关的益处的位置,我们使用了一种和弦学习任务(塞贝尔,1963年),其中一些和弦的正确表现会持续获得完成该组所需的分数奖励,而其他和弦的正确表现则没有奖励。训练后,参与者在没有奖励的情况下进行转移阶段,然后回答一份问卷以评估对奖励的明确意识。实验1表明,获得奖励的和弦比未获得奖励的和弦执行得更快,而且对和弦与奖励之间的关系几乎没有意识。实验2通过简化反应获得了类似的结果,表明奖励刺激组合的优势反映了刺激-反应(S-R)关联的更有效绑定,而不是对奖励关联的反应偏差或运动学习的改善。这些结果表明,奖励可用于显著改善S-R关联的学习,而无需直接操纵自上而下的因素。(PsycINFO数据库记录)