• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢曲松与头孢呋辛治疗细菌性脑膜炎的疗效比较

Comparative efficacy of ceftriaxone and cefuroxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis.

作者信息

Lebel M H, Hoyt M J, McCracken G H

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1989 Jun;114(6):1049-54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80462-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80462-7
PMID:2656960
Abstract

To assess the comparative efficacy of cefuroxime and ceftriaxone for the treatment of bacterial meningitis, we reviewed the records from four prospective efficacy trials conducted at our institution. One hundred seventy-four infants and children received ceftriaxone and 159 received cefuroxime. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were comparable at admission. After 24 hours of therapy, routine cerebrospinal fluid cultures for all patients treated with ceftriaxone were sterile, whereas 9% of cerebrospinal fluid cultures were positive in cefuroxime-treated patients (p less than 0.001). More cefuroxime-treated patients had abnormal physical examinations at the time of discharge than did ceftriaxone-treated patients (39/159 vs 25/174, p = 0.02). At 6-week and 1-year follow-up examinations, there was no longer a statistically significant difference in the incidence of neurologic abnormalities between the two therapy groups, but the incidence of hearing impairment in one or both ears was higher in the cefuroxime (18%) than in the ceftriaxone (11%) treatment group. Both regimens are efficacious for the treatment of bacterial meningitis, but some patients may not respond as satisfactorily to cefuroxime as to ceftriaxone.

摘要

为评估头孢呋辛和头孢曲松治疗细菌性脑膜炎的相对疗效,我们回顾了在本机构进行的四项前瞻性疗效试验的记录。174名婴幼儿和儿童接受了头孢曲松治疗,159名接受了头孢呋辛治疗。两组患者入院时的临床特征具有可比性。治疗24小时后,所有接受头孢曲松治疗的患者的常规脑脊液培养均无菌,而接受头孢呋辛治疗的患者中9%的脑脊液培养呈阳性(p<0.001)。出院时,接受头孢呋辛治疗的患者中有更多患者体检结果异常,高于接受头孢曲松治疗的患者(39/159 vs 25/174,p = 0.02)。在6周和1年的随访检查中,两组治疗组之间神经功能异常的发生率不再有统计学上的显著差异,但头孢呋辛治疗组单耳或双耳听力障碍的发生率(18%)高于头孢曲松治疗组(11%)。两种治疗方案对细菌性脑膜炎均有效,但部分患者对头孢呋辛的反应可能不如对头孢曲松那样令人满意。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of ceftriaxone and cefuroxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis.头孢曲松与头孢呋辛治疗细菌性脑膜炎的疗效比较
J Pediatr. 1989 Jun;114(6):1049-54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80462-7.
2
A comparison of ceftriaxone and cefuroxime for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与头孢呋辛治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1990 Jan 18;322(3):141-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199001183220301.
3
Cefuroxime versus ampicillin plus chloramphenicol in childhood bacterial meningitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.头孢呋辛与氨苄西林加氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的多中心随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 1986 Jul;109(1):123-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80591-1.
4
Delayed cerebrospinal fluid sterilization and adverse outcome of bacterial meningitis in infants and children.婴幼儿细菌性脑膜炎脑脊液杀菌延迟与不良预后
Pediatrics. 1989 Feb;83(2):161-7.
5
Cefuroxime versus ampicillin and chloramphenicol for the treatment of bacterial meningitis. Report from a Swedish Study Group.头孢呋辛与氨苄西林及氯霉素治疗细菌性脑膜炎的对比研究。瑞典研究小组报告。
Lancet. 1982 Feb 6;1(8267):295-9.
6
Prospective comparative trial of ceftriaxone vs. conventional therapy for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与传统疗法治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的前瞻性对照试验
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198507000-00006.
7
Bacterial meningitis in children: diagnosis and therapy. A review of recent developments.儿童细菌性脑膜炎:诊断与治疗。近期进展综述。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1987 Sep;26(9):431-8. doi: 10.1177/000992288702600901.
8
An extended experience with cefuroxime therapy of childhood bacterial meningitis.头孢呋辛治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的长期经验。
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1984 Sep-Oct;3(5):410-6. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198409000-00004.
9
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin and chloramphenicol for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与氨苄西林及氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的疗效比较
Lancet. 1983 Jun 4;1(8336):1241-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92696-x.
10
Randomised comparison of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone for childhood bacterial meningitis. Finnish Study Group.氯霉素、氨苄西林、头孢噻肟和头孢曲松用于儿童细菌性脑膜炎的随机对照研究。芬兰研究小组。
Lancet. 1989 Jun 10;1(8650):1281-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92685-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial therapy of bacterial meningitis with cefuroxime: Experience in 167 children.头孢呋辛用于细菌性脑膜炎的初始治疗:167例儿童的经验。
Can J Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;3(4):162-6. doi: 10.1155/1992/571867.
2
Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.头孢菌素类药物的药理学、药代动力学及临床应用综述。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1990;17(3):203-15.
3
Ceftriaxone: an update of its use in the management of community-acquired and nosocomial infections.头孢曲松:其在社区获得性感染和医院感染管理中应用的最新情况
Drugs. 2002;62(7):1041-89. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262070-00005.
4
Tailoring Antibiotic Treatment to Host Immune Status: The Host, Not the Drug, Determines Outcome.根据宿主免疫状态调整抗生素治疗:决定治疗结果的是宿主,而非药物。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2001 Aug;3(4):309-311. doi: 10.1007/s11908-001-0065-9.
5
Bacterial meningitis. Practical guidelines for management.细菌性脑膜炎。管理实用指南。
Drugs. 1995 Nov;50(5):838-53. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550050-00005.
6
Paediatrics--Part II.儿科学——第二部分。
Postgrad Med J. 1993 Apr;69(810):268-81. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.810.268.
7
Management of cerebral infection.脑部感染的管理
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;56(12):1243-58. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.12.1243.
8
Animal models as predictors of the safety and efficacy of antibiotics.作为抗生素安全性和有效性预测指标的动物模型。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990 Jul;9(7):472-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01964286.
9
Antibiotic resistance in Haemophilus influenzae: mechanisms, clinical importance and consequences for therapy.流感嗜血杆菌中的抗生素耐药性:机制、临床重要性及对治疗的影响
Eur J Pediatr. 1991 Jun;150(8):534-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02072202.
10
Dexamethasone in bacterial meningitis.地塞米松在细菌性脑膜炎中的应用。
Indian J Pediatr. 1991 Jul-Aug;58(4):421-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02750922.