• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢曲松与传统疗法治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的前瞻性对照试验

Prospective comparative trial of ceftriaxone vs. conventional therapy for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.

作者信息

Barson W J, Miller M A, Brady M T, Powell D A

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198507000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00006454-198507000-00006
PMID:3895175
Abstract

Fifty children with bacterial meningitis were prospectively evaluated in a randomized comparative trial of twice daily ceftriaxone with conventional ampicillin and chloramphenicol therapy. The groups were comparable in age, sex, days of illness before admission, severity of illness at admission, etiology and admission cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters and bacterial colony counts. The pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae type b (34 beta-lactamase-negative, 8 beta-lactamase-positive); Streptococcus pneumoniae (4); Neisseria meningitidis (3); and Streptococcus agalactiae (1). Initial CSF colony counts ranged from 2.5 X 10(2) to 1 X 10(10) colony-forming units/ml. In 44 children a lumbar puncture was repeated 10.5 to 18 hours after starting treatment; 16 of 24 (67%) ceftriaxone patients and 12 of 20 (60%) conventional therapy patients had sterile cultures. The reduction in the CSF bacterial colony counts (6.3 log10 colony-forming units/ml) was similar in both groups. Ceftriaxone CSF levels ranged from 1.0 to 8.0 micrograms/ml, representing a mean CSF penetration of 11.3% (range, 3.0 to 24.5%) of the simultaneous serum concentration. The median ceftriaxone bactericidal titer in CSF was 1:1024 compared with 1:4 achieved with conventional therapy. There were no significant differences in clinical responses or in frequency of complications, except for diarrhea which occurred in 59% of the ceftriaxone group and in 22% of the other (P less than 0.01). Despite one H. influenzae type b relapse occurring in the ceftriaxone group, ceftriaxone appears to be safe and as effective as conventional therapy for bacterial meningitis in children older than 2 months of age.

摘要

在一项将每日两次头孢曲松与传统氨苄西林和氯霉素疗法进行对比的随机试验中,对50例细菌性脑膜炎患儿进行了前瞻性评估。两组在年龄、性别、入院前患病天数、入院时病情严重程度、病因以及入院时脑脊液(CSF)参数和细菌菌落计数方面具有可比性。病原体包括b型流感嗜血杆菌(34株β-内酰胺酶阴性,8株β-内酰胺酶阳性);肺炎链球菌(4株);脑膜炎奈瑟菌(3株);以及无乳链球菌(1株)。初始脑脊液菌落计数范围为2.5×10²至1×10¹⁰菌落形成单位/毫升。44例患儿在开始治疗后10.5至18小时重复进行腰椎穿刺;24例接受头孢曲松治疗的患儿中有16例(67%)以及20例接受传统疗法患儿中有12例(60%)脑脊液培养无菌。两组脑脊液细菌菌落计数的降低幅度(6.3 log₁₀菌落形成单位/毫升)相似。头孢曲松脑脊液水平范围为1.0至8.0微克/毫升,意味着脑脊液平均渗透率为同时期血清浓度的11.3%(范围为3.0%至24.5%)。脑脊液中头孢曲松的中位杀菌效价为1:1024,而传统疗法为1:4。除腹泻外,临床反应或并发症发生率无显著差异,腹泻在头孢曲松组发生率为59%,在另一组为22%(P<0.01)。尽管头孢曲松组出现1例b型流感嗜血杆菌复发,但对于2个月以上儿童的细菌性脑膜炎,头孢曲松似乎安全且与传统疗法效果相当。

相似文献

1
Prospective comparative trial of ceftriaxone vs. conventional therapy for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与传统疗法治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的前瞻性对照试验
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):362-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198507000-00006.
2
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin and chloramphenicol for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.头孢曲松与氨苄西林及氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的疗效比较
Lancet. 1983 Jun 4;1(8336):1241-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92696-x.
3
Comparison of ceftriaxone and traditional therapy of bacterial meningitis.头孢曲松与细菌性脑膜炎传统疗法的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jan;25(1):40-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.25.1.40.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone to ampicillin/chloramphenicol in the treatment of childhood meningitis.头孢曲松与氨苄西林/氯霉素治疗儿童脑膜炎的疗效和安全性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Feb;13(2):143-51. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.2.143.
5
Randomised comparison of chloramphenicol, ampicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone for childhood bacterial meningitis. Finnish Study Group.氯霉素、氨苄西林、头孢噻肟和头孢曲松用于儿童细菌性脑膜炎的随机对照研究。芬兰研究小组。
Lancet. 1989 Jun 10;1(8650):1281-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92685-8.
6
Comparison of ceftriaxone and ampicillin plus chloramphenicol for the therapy of acute bacterial meningitis.头孢曲松与氨苄青霉素加氯霉素治疗急性细菌性脑膜炎的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Sep;28(3):361-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.3.361.
7
Cefuroxime versus ampicillin plus chloramphenicol in childhood bacterial meningitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.头孢呋辛与氨苄西林加氯霉素治疗儿童细菌性脑膜炎的多中心随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 1986 Jul;109(1):123-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80591-1.
8
Bacterial meningitis in children: diagnosis and therapy. A review of recent developments.儿童细菌性脑膜炎:诊断与治疗。近期进展综述。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1987 Sep;26(9):431-8. doi: 10.1177/000992288702600901.
9
Cefotaxime and ceftriaxone cerebrospinal fluid levels during treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.儿童细菌性脑膜炎治疗期间头孢噻肟和头孢曲松的脑脊液水平
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Nov;26(5):408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.08.005. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
10
Sulbactam/ampicillin vs. chloramphenicol/ampicillin for the treatment of meningitis in infants and children.舒巴坦/氨苄西林与氯霉素/氨苄西林治疗婴幼儿脑膜炎的比较。
Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S620-9. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.supplement_5.s620.

引用本文的文献

1
Progression of antibiotic resistance in .……中抗生素耐药性的进展
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2025 Mar 13;38(1):e0021524. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00215-24. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Cefotaxime Versus Ceftriaxone: A Comprehensive Comparative Review.头孢噻肟与头孢曲松:全面比较综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69146. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
An In Vitro Susceptibility Study of Cefotaxime-Sulbactam on Clinical Bacterial Isolates From Various Regions in India: A Comparison With Ceftriaxone-Sulbactam.头孢噻肟-舒巴坦对印度不同地区临床分离菌的体外药敏研究:与头孢曲松-舒巴坦的比较
Cureus. 2023 Mar 13;15(3):e36078. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36078. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Pre-admission antibiotics for suspected cases of meningococcal disease.疑似脑膜炎球菌病病例的入院前抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 14;6(6):CD005437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005437.pub4.
5
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.第三代头孢菌素与传统抗生素治疗急性细菌性脑膜炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD001832. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001832.pub3.
6
Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.头孢菌素类药物的药理学、药代动力学及临床应用综述。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1990;17(3):203-15.
7
Chloramphenicol or ceftriaxone, or both, as treatment for meningitis in developing countries?在发展中国家,氯霉素或头孢曲松,或两者并用,可用于治疗脑膜炎吗?
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Jun;88(6):536-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.6.536.
8
In vitro antibiotic sensitivity pattern of common bacterial isolates from cases of acute bacterial meningitis with special reference to ceftriaxone.急性细菌性脑膜炎病例中常见分离菌株的体外抗生素敏感性模式,特别提及头孢曲松。
Indian J Pediatr. 1997 Nov-Dec;64(6):849-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02725510.
9
Chemotherapy for bacterial infections of the central nervous system.中枢神经系统细菌感染的化疗。
West J Med. 1987 Sep;147(3):309-13.
10
Cefotaxime versus chloramphenicol for ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. A retrospective study of 62 cases.
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:199-202. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00043.