• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术中对神经肌肉阻滞剂的过敏反应:韩国两家三级医院9年期间的发生率:一项回顾性观察研究

Intraoperative anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents: the incidence over 9 years at two tertiary hospitals in South Korea: A retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Cho Youn J, Ju Jae W, Sim Hyunyee, Lee Jong-Hwan, Hong Deok M, Kim Tae K, Min Jeong Jin, Song Woo-Jung, Kang Hye-Ryun, Cho Sang-Heon, Jeon Yunseok

机构信息

From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital (YJC, JWJ, DMH, TKK, YJ); Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (HS, J-HL, JJM); and Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (W-JS, H-RK, S-HC).

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 May;33(5):368-78. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000373.

DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000373
PMID:26575006
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) is a rare event that is unpredictable and potentially life threatening. Most of the previous reports on such intraoperative anaphylaxis used market share surveys or self-reported data to estimate the incidence.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidences of intraoperative anaphylaxis to NMBAs using electronic medical records.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Two tertiary hospitals in South Korea.

PATIENTS

This study involved patients exposed to NMBAs during anaesthesia between 1 January 2005 and 31 May 2014. Nineteen episodes were deemed to be intraoperative anaphylaxis to NMBAs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We calculated the incidences of intraoperative anaphylaxis to NMBAs. Exposure to the agents was determined from intraoperative records maintained in an electronic medical recording system. An anaphylactic reaction was determined from both clinical signs and the results of skin tests.

RESULTS

Over 9 years, 729 429 patients were exposed to NMBA, the most frequently used being rocuronium [425 047 (58.3%)] and vecuronium [274 801 (37.7%)]. The overall incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis was 2.6 per 100 000 (19 cases), and was higher with rocuronium (16 cases, 3.8 per 100 000) than with vecuronium (two cases, 0.7 cases per 100 000), P = 0.014. Comparing the first 3 years with the last 6 years, the incidence of intraoperative rocuronium anaphylaxis appeared to increase 1.4-fold (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Among commonly used NMBAs, rocuronium appears to have the highest incidence of anaphylaxis. Our findings suggest that future prospective investigation for NMBA-induced anaphylaxis should use internationally agreed skin test protocols.

摘要

背景

术中对神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBAs)发生过敏反应是一种罕见事件,不可预测且可能危及生命。此前关于此类术中过敏反应的大多数报告使用市场份额调查或自我报告数据来估计发病率。

目的

利用电子病历确定术中对NMBAs过敏反应的发生率。

设计

一项回顾性观察研究。

地点

韩国的两家三级医院。

患者

本研究纳入了2005年1月1日至2014年5月31日期间在麻醉过程中接触NMBAs的患者。19例被判定为术中对NMBAs过敏反应。

主要观察指标

我们计算了术中对NMBAs过敏反应的发生率。通过电子病历系统中保存的术中记录确定是否接触过这些药物。根据临床体征和皮肤试验结果判定过敏反应。

结果

在9年期间,729429例患者接触过NMBAs,最常用的是罗库溴铵[425047例(58.3%)]和维库溴铵[274801例(37.7%)]。术中过敏反应的总体发生率为每100000例中有2.6例(19例),罗库溴铵引起的过敏反应发生率(16例,每100000例中有3.8例)高于维库溴铵(2例,每100000例中有0.7例),P = 0.014。将前3年与后6年进行比较,术中罗库溴铵过敏反应的发生率似乎增加了1.4倍(P = 0.006)。

结论

在常用的NMBAs中,罗库溴铵似乎过敏反应发生率最高。我们的研究结果表明,未来针对NMBAs引起的过敏反应的前瞻性研究应采用国际认可的皮肤试验方案。

相似文献

1
Intraoperative anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents: the incidence over 9 years at two tertiary hospitals in South Korea: A retrospective observational study.术中对神经肌肉阻滞剂的过敏反应:韩国两家三级医院9年期间的发生率:一项回顾性观察研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 May;33(5):368-78. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000373.
2
Anaphylaxis is more common with rocuronium and succinylcholine than with atracurium.罗库溴铵和琥珀胆碱比阿曲库铵更易引起过敏反应。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Jan;122(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000512.
3
Differentiating the cellular and humoral components of neuromuscular blocking agent-induced anaphylactic reactions in patients undergoing anaesthesia.区分麻醉患者中神经肌肉阻滞剂诱导的过敏反应的细胞和体液成分。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):665-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer028. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
4
Rocuronium anaphylaxis in a 3-year-old girl with no previous exposure to neuromuscular blocking agents.3 岁女童无神经肌肉阻滞剂接触史发生罗库溴铵过敏反应。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2013 Jun;31(2):163-6. doi: 10.12932/AP0256.31.2.2013.
5
The risk of anaphylactic reactions to rocuronium in the United States is comparable to that of vecuronium: an analysis of food and drug administration reporting of adverse events.在美国,罗库溴铵发生过敏反应的风险与维库溴铵相当:对食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告的分析。
Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):819-822. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000175213.87556.D8.
6
Skin reactions to intradermal neuromuscular blocking agent injections: a randomized multicenter trial in healthy volunteers.皮内注射神经肌肉阻滞剂的皮肤反应:一项在健康志愿者中的随机多中心试验。
Anesthesiology. 2007 Aug;107(2):245-52. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000270721.27309.b3.
7
[Severe anaphylactic reactions after administration of rocuronium].[罗库溴铵给药后发生的严重过敏反应]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1999 Oct;18(8):896-900. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(00)88195-2.
8
Rocuronium: high risk for anaphylaxis?罗库溴铵:过敏反应的高风险?
Br J Anaesth. 2001 May;86(5):678-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.5.678.
9
Anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs: incidence and cross-reactivity in Western Australia from 2002 to 2011.2002 年至 2011 年西澳大利亚地区神经肌肉阻滞剂过敏反应的发生率和交叉反应性。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):981-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes506. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
10
Failure to investigate anaesthetic anaphylaxis resulting in a preventable second anaphylactic reaction.未能对麻醉过敏反应进行调查,导致了可预防的第二次过敏反应。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Nov;40(6):1053-5. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1204000619.

引用本文的文献

1
Could Artificial Intelligence Prevent Intraoperative Anaphylaxis? Reference Review and Proof of Concept.人工智能能否预防术中过敏反应?文献回顾与概念验证。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 26;58(11):1530. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111530.
2
Risk predictive tools of perioperative drug hypersensitivity reaction: A case-control study.围手术期药物过敏反应风险预测工具:一项病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262362. eCollection 2022.
3
Estimated Incidence of Sugammadex-Induced Anaphylaxis Using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database.
利用韩国不良事件报告系统数据库估算舒更葡糖钠所致过敏反应的发生率。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 21;10(15):3202. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153202.