Zaman Jonas, Weltens Nathalie, Ly Huynh Giao, Struyf Dieter, Vlaeyen Johan W S, Van den Bergh Omer, Wiech Katja, Van Oudenhove Lukas, Van Diest Ilse
From the Research Group Health Psychology (Zaman, Vlaeyen, Van den Bergh, Van Diest), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences; Translational Research Centre for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Weltens, Ly, Van Oudenhove); and Centre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology (Struyf), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department Clinical Psychological Science (Vlaeyen), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB) (Wiech) and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Wiech), Nuffield Division Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; and Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (Van Oudenhove), University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Psychosom Med. 2016 Feb-Mar;78(2):248-58. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000257.
Interoceptive fear learning and generalization have been hypothesized to play a key role in unexplained abdominal and esophageal pain in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. However, there is no experimental evidence demonstrating that fear learning and generalization to visceral sensations can be established in humans and alter visceral perception.
In a novel fear learning-generalization paradigm, an innocuous esophageal balloon distension served as conditioned stimulus (CS), and distensions at three different pressure levels around the pain detection threshold were used as generalization stimuli. During fear learning, the CS was paired with a painful electrical stimulus (unconditioned stimulus) in the conditioning group (n = 30), whereas in the control group (n = 30), the unconditioned stimulus was delivered alone. Before and after fear learning, visceral perception thresholds for first sensation, discomfort, and pain and visceral discrimination sensitivity were assessed.
Fear learning was established in the conditioning group only (potentiated eye-blink startle to the CS (t(464.06) = 3.17, p = .002), and fear generalization to other stimulus intensities was observed (t(469.12) = 2.97, p = .003; t(464.29) = 4.17, p < .001). The thresholds for first sensation habituated in the control group, whereas it remained constant in the conditioning group (F(1,43) = 9.77, p = .003).
These data show that fear learning using visceral stimuli induces fear generalization and influences visceral perception. These findings support the idea that in functional gastrointestinal disorder, fear learning and generalization can foster gastrointestinal-specific anxiety and contribute to visceral hypersensitivity.
内感受性恐惧学习和泛化被认为在功能性胃肠病患者无法解释的腹部和食管疼痛中起关键作用。然而,尚无实验证据表明人类能够建立对内脏感觉的恐惧学习和泛化,并改变内脏感知。
在一种新型的恐惧学习 - 泛化范式中,无害的食管球囊扩张作为条件刺激(CS),并使用疼痛检测阈值周围三个不同压力水平的扩张作为泛化刺激。在恐惧学习期间,条件刺激组(n = 30)中CS与疼痛性电刺激(无条件刺激)配对,而在对照组(n = 30)中,无条件刺激单独给予。在恐惧学习前后,评估首次感觉、不适和疼痛的内脏感知阈值以及内脏辨别敏感性。
仅在条件刺激组中建立了恐惧学习(对CS的眨眼惊跳反应增强(t(464.06) = 3.17,p = .002)),并且观察到对其他刺激强度的恐惧泛化(t(469.12) = 2.97,p = .003;t(464.29) = 4.17,p < .001)。对照组中首次感觉的阈值出现习惯化,而在条件刺激组中保持不变(F(1,43) = 9.77,p = .003)。
这些数据表明,使用内脏刺激的恐惧学习会引发恐惧泛化并影响内脏感知。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即在功能性胃肠病中,恐惧学习和泛化会加剧胃肠道特异性焦虑并导致内脏超敏反应。