Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Oct;36(10):e14877. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14877. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are symptom-based disorders categorized by anatomic location but have high overlap and heterogeneity. Viewing DGBI symptoms on a spectrum (i.e. dimensionally) rather than categorically may better inform interventions to accommodate complex clinical presentations. We aimed to evaluate symptom networks to identify how DGBI symptoms interact.
We used the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire continuously/ordinally scored items collected from the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study. We excluded participants who reported ≥1 organic/structural gastrointestinal disorder(s). We sought to (1) identify core symptoms in the DGBI symptom networks, (2) identify bridge pathways between Rome IV diagnostic categories (esophageal, bowel, gastroduodenal, anorectal), and (3) explore how symptoms group together into communities.
Of 54,127 adults, 20,229 met criteria for at least one DGBI (age mean = 42.2 ± 15.5; 57% female). General abdominal pain and epigastric pain were the core symptoms in the DGBI symptom network (i.e., had the strongest connections to other symptoms). Pain symptoms emerged as bridge pathways across existing DGBI diagnostic anatomic location (i.e., abdominal pain connected to chest pain, epigastric pain, rectal pain). Without a priori category definitions, exploratory network community analysis showed that symptoms grouped together into "pain," "gastroduodenal," and "constipation," rather than into groups by anatomic location.
Our findings suggest pain symptoms are central and serve as a key connection to other symptoms, crosscutting anatomic location. Future longitudinal research is needed to test symptom network relations longitudinally and investigate whether targeting pain symptoms (rather than anatomic- or disorder-specific symptoms) has clinical impact.
肠-脑相互作用障碍(DGBI)是基于症状的疾病,根据解剖位置分类,但具有高度重叠和异质性。以谱(即维度)而非分类的方式看待 DGBI 症状,可能更有助于为适应复杂的临床表现提供干预措施。我们旨在评估症状网络,以确定 DGBI 症状如何相互作用。
我们使用 Rome IV 诊断问卷连续/有序评分项,这些评分项来自 Rome 基金会全球流行病学研究。我们排除了报告≥1 种器质性/结构性胃肠道疾病的参与者。我们试图(1)确定 DGBI 症状网络中的核心症状,(2)确定 Rome IV 诊断类别(食管、肠道、胃十二指肠、肛直肠)之间的桥梁途径,以及(3)探索症状如何组合成社区。
在 54127 名成年人中,有 20229 人符合至少一种 DGBI 的标准(年龄平均值=42.2±15.5;57%为女性)。一般腹痛和上腹痛是 DGBI 症状网络中的核心症状(即与其他症状的联系最强)。疼痛症状出现在现有的 DGBI 诊断解剖位置的桥梁途径中(即腹痛与胸痛、上腹痛、直肠痛相连)。在没有先验类别定义的情况下,探索性网络社区分析表明,症状组合成“疼痛”、“胃十二指肠”和“便秘”,而不是按解剖位置分组。
我们的研究结果表明,疼痛症状是核心症状,是与其他症状的关键连接,跨越解剖位置。未来需要进行纵向研究,以测试症状网络关系的纵向变化,并研究是否针对疼痛症状(而不是解剖或疾病特异性症状)具有临床影响。