Aylward L L, Hays S M
Summit Toxicology, LLP, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Summit Toxicology, LLP, Lyons, CO, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Dec;73(3):765-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Urinary biomonitoring data for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) reflect aggregate population exposures to trace 2,4-D residues in diet and the environment. These data can be interpreted in the context of current risk assessments by comparison to a Biomonitoring Equivalent (BE), which is an estimate of the average biomarker concentration consistent with an exposure guidance value such as the US EPA Reference Dose (RfD). BE values are updated here from previous published BE values to reflect a change in the US EPA RfD. The US EPA RfD has been updated to reflect a revised point of departure (POD) based on new information from additional toxicological studies and updated assessment of applicable uncertainty factors. In addition, new biomonitoring data from both the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) have been published. The updated US EPA chronic RfD of 0.21 mg/kg-d results in updated BE values of 10,500 and 7000 μg/L for adults and children, respectively. Comparison of the current population-representative data to these BE values shows that upper bound population biomarker concentrations are more than 5000-fold below BE values corresponding to the updated US EPA RfD. This biomonitoring-based risk assessment supports the conclusion that current use patterns in the US and Canada result in incidental exposures in the general population that can be considered negligible in the context of the current 2,4-D risk assessment.
2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4-D)的尿液生物监测数据反映了总体人群对饮食和环境中痕量2,4-D残留的暴露情况。通过与生物监测当量(BE)进行比较,这些数据可以在当前风险评估的背景下进行解读,生物监测当量是与暴露指导值(如美国环境保护局参考剂量(RfD))一致的平均生物标志物浓度的估计值。此处根据先前公布的BE值对其进行了更新,以反映美国环境保护局RfD的变化。美国环境保护局的RfD已更新,以反映基于额外毒理学研究的新信息和适用不确定性因素的更新评估得出的修订起点(POD)。此外,美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)和加拿大健康指标调查(CHMS)的新生物监测数据也已公布。美国环境保护局更新后的慢性RfD为0.21 mg/kg-天,导致成人和儿童的BE值分别更新为10,500和7000 μg/L。将当前具有人群代表性的数据与这些BE值进行比较表明,人群生物标志物浓度上限比与更新后的美国环境保护局RfD对应的BE值低5000倍以上。这种基于生物监测的风险评估支持以下结论:美国和加拿大目前的使用模式导致一般人群的偶然暴露,在当前2,4-D风险评估的背景下可认为微不足道。