European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Water Resources Unit, 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7050, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Feb 1;543(Pt A):123-134. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.021. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Legislation in Europe has been adopted to determine and improve the ecological integrity of inland and coastal waters. Assessment is based on four biotic groups, including benthic macroinvertebrate communities. For lakes, benthic invertebrates have been recognized as one of the most difficult organism groups to use in ecological assessment, and hitherto their use in ecological assessment has been limited. In this study, we review and intercalibrate 13 benthic invertebrate-based tools across Europe. These assessment tools address different human impacts: acidification (3 methods), eutrophication (3 methods), morphological alterations (2 methods), and a combination of the last two (5 methods). For intercalibration, the methods were grouped into four intercalibration groups, according to the habitat sampled and putative pressure. Boundaries of the 'good ecological status' were compared and harmonized using direct or indirect comparison approaches. To enable indirect comparison of the methods, three common pressure indices and two common biological multimetric indices were developed for larger geographical areas. Additionally, we identified the best-performing methods based on their responsiveness to different human impacts. Based on these experiences, we provide practical recommendations for the development and harmonization of benthic invertebrate assessment methods in lakes and similar habitats.
欧洲已通过立法来确定和提高内陆和沿海水域的生态完整性。评估基于四个生物群,包括底栖大型无脊椎动物群落。对于湖泊而言,底栖无脊椎动物已被认为是最难用于生态评估的生物群体之一,迄今为止,它们在生态评估中的应用受到限制。在这项研究中,我们回顾和校准了欧洲的 13 种基于底栖无脊椎动物的工具。这些评估工具针对不同的人为影响:酸化(3 种方法)、富营养化(3 种方法)、形态改变(2 种方法)以及后两者的组合(5 种方法)。为了进行校准,根据采样的栖息地和潜在压力将方法分为四个校准组。使用直接或间接比较方法比较和协调“良好生态状况”的边界。为了能够间接比较这些方法,针对更大的地理区域开发了三个常用的压力指数和两个常用的生物多指标指数。此外,我们根据它们对不同人为影响的响应能力,确定了表现最好的方法。基于这些经验,我们为湖泊和类似生境中底栖无脊椎动物评估方法的制定和协调提供了实用建议。