Suppr超能文献

监管模式与冒险行为:预期后悔的中介作用。

Regulatory Mode and Risk-Taking: The Mediating Role of Anticipated Regret.

作者信息

Panno Angelo, Lauriola Marco, Pierro Antonio

机构信息

Department of Education, Experimental Psychology Laboratory, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy.

Department of Social & Developmental Psychology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0143147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143147. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

We propose that decision maker's regulatory mode affects risk-taking through anticipated regret. In the Study 1 either a locomotion or an assessment orientation were experimentally induced, and in the Studies 2 and 3 these different orientations were assessed as chronic individual differences. To assess risk-taking we used two behavioral measures of risk: BART and hot-CCT. The results show that experimentally induced assessment orientation--compared to locomotion--leads to decreased risk-taking through increased anticipated regret (Study 1). People chronically predisposed to be in the assessment state take less risk through increased anticipated regret (Study 2 and Study 3). Study 2 results also show a marginally non-significant indirect effect of chronic locomotion mode on BART through anticipated regret. Differently, Study 3 shows that people chronically predisposed to be in the locomotion state take greater risk through decreased anticipated regret, when play a dynamic risk task triggering stronger emotional arousal. Through all three studies, the average effect size for the relationship of assessment with anticipated regret was in the moderate-large range, whereas for risk-taking was in the moderate range. The average effect size for the relationship of locomotion with anticipated regret was in the moderate range, whereas for risk-taking was in the small-moderate range. These results increase our understanding of human behavior under conditions of risk obtaining novel insights into regulatory mode theory and decision science.

摘要

我们认为,决策者的调节模式通过预期后悔影响冒险行为。在研究1中,通过实验诱导出行动或评估导向,而在研究2和3中,将这些不同的导向评估为个体的长期差异。为了评估冒险行为,我们使用了两种冒险行为的测量方法:气球模拟风险任务(BART)和热认知反思测试(hot-CCT)。结果表明,与行动导向相比,实验诱导出的评估导向会通过增加预期后悔导致冒险行为减少(研究1)。长期倾向于处于评估状态的人会通过增加预期后悔而减少冒险行为(研究2和3)。研究2的结果还显示,长期的行动模式通过预期后悔对气球模拟风险任务(BART)产生的间接效应略微不显著。不同的是,研究3表明,当进行引发更强烈情绪唤醒的动态风险任务时,长期倾向于处于行动状态的人会通过减少预期后悔而承担更大的风险。在所有三项研究中,评估与预期后悔关系的平均效应量处于中到大范围,而与冒险行为关系的平均效应量处于中等范围。行动与预期后悔关系的平均效应量处于中等范围,而与冒险行为关系的平均效应量处于小到中等范围。这些结果增进了我们对风险条件下人类行为的理解,为调节模式理论和决策科学提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dac0/4651368/421dfd956ff7/pone.0143147.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验