Rönkä Kirsi, Vironen Jaana, Kössi Jyrki, Hulmi Tanja, Silvasti Seppo, Hakala Tapio, Ilves Imre, Song Indrek, Hertsi Merja, Juvonen Petri, Paajanen Hannu
*Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland †Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland ‡Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland §North-Karelia Central Hospital, Joensuu, Finland ¶Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland ||Savonlinna Central Hospital, Savonlinna, Finland.
Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):714-9; discussion 719-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001458.
Three different mesh fixation techniques were compared to find out how to perform a safe and cost-effective open inguinal hernioplasty in day-case setting with the best outcomes with regard to chronic pain.
Mesh fixation method may influence on the incidence of chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernioplasty.
Lichtenstein hernioplasty was performed under local anesthesia in 625 patients as day-case surgery in 8 Finnish hospitals. The patients were randomized to receive either a cyanoacrylate glue (Histoacryl, n = 216), self-gripping mesh (Parietex ProGrip, n = 202), or conventional nonabsorbable sutures (Prolene 2-0, n = 207) for mesh fixation. The incidence of wound complications, pain, recurrences, and patients discomfort was recorded on days 1, 7, 30, and 1 year after surgery. The primary endpoint was the sensation of pain measured by pain scores and the need of analgesics after 1 year of surgery.
The type and size of inguinal hernias were similar in the 3 study groups. The duration of operation was 34 ± 13, 32 ± 9, and 38 ± 9 minutes in the glue, self-gripping, and suture groups, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences postoperatively in pain response or need for analgesics between the study groups. Two superficial infections (0.3%), 31 wound seromas (5.0%), and 4 recurrent hernias (0.6%) were recorded during a 1-year follow-up. Some 25 patients (4.2%) needed occasionally analgesics for chronic groin pain. A feeling of a foreign object and quality of life were similar in all study groups.
This randomized trial failed to prove that mesh fixation without sutures causes less inguinodynia than suture fixation in Lichtenstein hernioplasty. Mesh fixation without sutures is feasible without compromising postoperative outcome.
比较三种不同的补片固定技术,以找出如何在日间手术环境中进行安全且经济高效的开放式腹股沟疝修补术,并在慢性疼痛方面取得最佳效果。
补片固定方法可能会影响Lichtenstein疝修补术后慢性疼痛的发生率。
在芬兰的8家医院,对625例患者在局部麻醉下进行Lichtenstein疝修补术作为日间手术。患者被随机分为三组,分别接受氰基丙烯酸酯胶水(Histoacryl,n = 216)、自固定补片(Parietex ProGrip,n = 202)或传统不可吸收缝线(Prolene 2-0,n = 207)进行补片固定。记录术后第1天、第7天、第30天和第1年的伤口并发症、疼痛、复发情况及患者不适情况。主要终点是术后1年通过疼痛评分测量的疼痛感觉和镇痛药的使用需求。
三个研究组的腹股沟疝类型和大小相似。胶水组、自固定组和缝线组的手术时间分别为34±13分钟、32±9分钟和38±9分钟(P<0.001)。研究组之间术后疼痛反应或镇痛药使用需求无显著差异。在1年的随访中,记录到2例浅表感染(0.3%)、31例伤口血清肿(5.0%)和4例复发性疝(0.6%)。约25例患者(4.2%)偶尔需要使用镇痛药来缓解慢性腹股沟疼痛。所有研究组的异物感和生活质量相似。
这项随机试验未能证明在Lichtenstein疝修补术中,无缝线补片固定比缝线固定导致的腹股沟疼痛更少。无缝线补片固定在不影响术后结果的情况下是可行的。