• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较腹股沟疝开放前路补片修补术与完全腹膜外修补术后早期患者报告疼痛情况的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial comparing early patient-reported pain after open anterior mesh repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia.

作者信息

Matikainen Markku, Vironen Jaana Hellevi, Silvasti Seppo, Ilves Imre, Kössi Jyrki, Kivivuori Antti, Paajanen Hannu

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala, Kuopio, Finland.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Espoo, Finland.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 1;108(12):1433-1437. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab354.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znab354
PMID:34791044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10364913/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This was a prospective, multicentre, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial involving two parallel groups of patients.

METHODS

Adult patients with symptomatic unilateral primary inguinal hernia were included in this study. Patients were enrolled and treated in five Finnish hospitals. Eligible patients were randomized by use of a computer-based program to receiving either open anterior repair (modified Lichtenstein) with glue mesh fixation or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. The primary aims were to compare 30-day patient-reported pain scores and return to work after surgery between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients were randomized: 98 patients to TEP repair and 104 patients to open repair. All randomized patients received their allocated treatment. A total of 86 patients (88 per cent) in the TEP group and 94 patients (90 per cent) in the Lichtenstein group completed the 30-day follow-up. Patients experienced less early pain (P < 0.001) and used less analgesics after TEP repair, compared to those who had modified Lichtenstein repair. Two patients in the TEP group and five in the Lichtenstein group developed superficial wound infection (P = 0⋅446). Only one reoperation was performed in the Lichtenstein group due to haematoma.

CONCLUSION

TEP inguinal hernia repair is associated with less early postoperative pain compared to the open glue mesh fixation technique.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03566433 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

背景

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、非盲法、随机临床试验,涉及两组平行的患者。

方法

本研究纳入有症状的单侧原发性腹股沟疝成年患者。患者在芬兰的五家医院入组并接受治疗。符合条件的患者通过计算机程序随机分为接受开放式前路修补术(改良Lichtenstein术)加胶水网片固定或完全腹膜外(TEP)修补术。主要目的是比较两组患者术后30天的患者报告疼痛评分和术后恢复工作情况。

结果

共有202例患者被随机分组:98例接受TEP修补术,104例接受开放式修补术。所有随机分组的患者均接受了分配的治疗。TEP组共有86例患者(88%)和Lichtenstein组94例患者(90%)完成了30天随访。与接受改良Lichtenstein修补术的患者相比,TEP修补术后患者早期疼痛较轻(P<0.001)且使用的镇痛药较少。TEP组有2例患者和Lichtenstein组有5例患者发生浅表伤口感染(P=0.446)。Lichtenstein组仅因血肿进行了1次再次手术。

结论

与开放式胶水网片固定技术相比,TEP腹股沟疝修补术术后早期疼痛较轻。

试验注册

NCT03566433(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d8c/10364913/7d3f3d2fcea5/znab354f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d8c/10364913/7e783159a829/znab354f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d8c/10364913/bca47cf38360/znab354f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d8c/10364913/7d3f3d2fcea5/znab354f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d8c/10364913/7e783159a829/znab354f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d8c/10364913/bca47cf38360/znab354f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d8c/10364913/7d3f3d2fcea5/znab354f3.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized clinical trial comparing early patient-reported pain after open anterior mesh repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia.一项比较腹股沟疝开放前路补片修补术与完全腹膜外修补术后早期患者报告疼痛情况的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 1;108(12):1433-1437. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab354.
2
Randomized clinical trial comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (TEPLICH trial).随机临床试验比较完全腹膜外与经耻骨肌孔修补术(TEPLICH 试验)治疗腹股沟疝。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):845-855. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11230.
3
Comparison between Lichtenstein And Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitonial (TEP) Tension Free Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia.Lichtenstein 与腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的比较。
Mymensingh Med J. 2022 Oct;31(4):1128-1134.
4
Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study.完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的随机临床试验:一项长期随访研究
Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):256-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2023.
5
Totally extraperitoneal repair under general anesthesia versus Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia for unilateral inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.全身麻醉下完全腹膜外修补术与局部麻醉下李金斯坦修补术治疗单侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):996-1002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3269-9. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
6
Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair with the ONSTEP versus the Lichtenstein technique, results of a double-blinded multicenter randomized clinical trial.使用ONSTEP与Lichtenstein技术进行腹股沟疝修补术后的慢性疼痛,一项双盲多中心随机临床试验的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Mar;402(2):213-218. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1532-y. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
7
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)途径:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):639-49. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1931-7. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
8
Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.随机比较腹腔镜与李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术后 5 年的慢性疼痛。
Br J Surg. 2010 Apr;97(4):600-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6904.
9
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术与开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
10
TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6 weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial.全麻下单侧经肛门内镜微创手术(TEP)在术后 6 周时疼痛程度优于局部麻醉下的经腹会阴联合切除术(Lichtenstein):一项随机临床试验的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3632-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2936-1. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with self-fixated meshes: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜下使用自固定补片修补腹股沟疝:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2425-2435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11616-5. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Laparoscopic vs. Open Approach in Emergent Inguinal Hernia: Our Experience and Review of Literature.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗急诊腹股沟疝:我们的经验及文献综述
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023 Jun 16;2:11242. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2023.11242. eCollection 2023.
3
Two-port (single incision plus one port) versus single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: a retrospective comparative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials.完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术(TEP)与李金斯坦疝修补术的比较:基于更新的传统荟萃分析和累积荟萃分析的随机对照试验的系统评价。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1093-1103. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02049-w. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
2
Comparison of early and long term outcomes of open Lichtenstein repair and totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy for primary inguinal hernias.开放型 Lichtenstein 修补术与完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的早期和长期疗效比较。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 11;49(1):38-41. doi: 10.3906/sag-1803-94.
3
两孔法(单切口加一孔)与单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的回顾性对比研究。
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):595-600. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01716-z. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
4
Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.切塞纳指南:WSES 关于普通外科急症和腹部创伤腹腔镜优先方法的共识声明。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9.
5
Laparoscopic approach in emergency for the treatment of acute incarcerated groin hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜技术在治疗急性嵌顿腹股沟疝中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):485-501. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02631-9. Epub 2022 May 26.
Effects of transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
经腹腹膜前和完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的效果:一项更新的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):418-428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6314-x. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
4
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中,使用胶水与缝线进行补片固定对慢性疼痛和复发的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD010814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2.
6
Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair in inguinal hernia without mesh fixation.腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)修补术治疗腹股沟疝且不进行补片固定的长期随访
Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1558-7. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
7
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Suture Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: 7-Year Outcome Analysis.比较氰基丙烯酸酯胶水与缝线固定用于李金斯坦疝修补术的随机临床试验:7年结果分析
World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):108-113. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3801-x.
8
Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Glue Fixation, Self-gripping Mesh, and Suture Fixation of Mesh in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair (FinnMesh Study).比较胶水固定、自固定补片和补片缝合固定用于Lichtenstein疝修补术的随机多中心试验(芬兰补片研究)
Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):714-9; discussion 719-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001458.
9
TEP under general anesthesia is superior to Lichtenstein under local anesthesia in terms of pain 6 weeks after surgery: results from a randomized clinical trial.全麻下单侧经肛门内镜微创手术(TEP)在术后 6 周时疼痛程度优于局部麻醉下的经腹会阴联合切除术(Lichtenstein):一项随机临床试验的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3632-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2936-1. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
10
Beneficial effects of fibrin glue (Quixil) versus Lichtenstein conventional technique in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial.纤维蛋白胶(Quixil)与传统的腹股沟疝修补术(Lichtenstein 技术)相比在腹股沟疝修补术中的有益效果:一项随机临床试验。
Hernia. 2014 Apr;18(2):185-92. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-1020-4. Epub 2012 Nov 20.