• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用预测市场预测研究评估。

Using prediction markets to forecast research evaluations.

机构信息

MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol , Bristol, UK ; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Experimental Psychology , University of Bristol , Bristol, UK.

New Zealand Institute for Advanced Study , Massey University , Palmerston North, New Zealand ; Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin , Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Oct 28;2(10):150287. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150287. eCollection 2015 Oct.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.150287
PMID:26587243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4632515/
Abstract

The 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) was conducted to assess the quality of research carried out at higher education institutions in the UK over a 6 year period. However, the process was criticized for being expensive and bureaucratic, and it was argued that similar information could be obtained more simply from various existing metrics. We were interested in whether a prediction market on the outcome of REF2014 for 33 chemistry departments in the UK would provide information similar to that obtained during the REF2014 process. Prediction markets have become increasingly popular as a means of capturing what is colloquially known as the 'wisdom of crowds', and enable individuals to trade 'bets' on whether a specific outcome will occur or not. These have been shown to be successful at predicting various outcomes in a number of domains (e.g. sport, entertainment and politics), but have rarely been tested against outcomes based on expert judgements such as those that formed the basis of REF2014.

摘要

2014 年科研卓越框架(REF2014)旨在评估英国高等教育机构在六年期间内开展的研究质量。然而,该过程因昂贵且官僚主义而受到批评,有人认为可以从各种现有指标中更简单地获得类似信息。我们感兴趣的是,针对英国 33 个化学系的 REF2014 结果进行的预测市场是否会提供与 REF2014 过程中获得的信息相似的信息。预测市场作为一种获取通俗意义上的“群体智慧”的手段,已经越来越受欢迎,使个人能够就特定结果是否会发生进行“投注”交易。这些在许多领域(如体育、娱乐和政治)的各种结果预测中已经被证明是成功的,但很少针对基于专家判断的结果进行测试,例如构成 REF2014 基础的那些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bff/4632515/e681e117e55e/rsos150287-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bff/4632515/e681e117e55e/rsos150287-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bff/4632515/e681e117e55e/rsos150287-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
Using prediction markets to forecast research evaluations.利用预测市场预测研究评估。
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Oct 28;2(10):150287. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150287. eCollection 2015 Oct.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Evidencing the impact of cancer trials: insights from the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework.证明癌症试验的影响:来自 2014 年英国卓越研究框架的见解。
Trials. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04425-9.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
The wisdom of crowds in action: Forecasting epidemic diseases with a web-based prediction market system.群体智慧在行动:利用基于网络的预测市场系统预测流行病
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Aug;92:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 7.
6
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Research impact in the community-based health sciences: an analysis of 162 case studies from the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework.社区健康科学中的研究影响力:对2014年英国卓越研究框架中162个案例研究的分析
BMC Med. 2015 Sep 21;13:232. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0467-4.
9
Predicting replicability-Analysis of survey and prediction market data from large-scale forecasting projects.预测可重复性-对大规模预测项目中的调查和预测市场数据的分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0248780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248780. eCollection 2021.
10
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Forecasting the publication and citation outcomes of COVID-19 preprints.预测新冠病毒预印本的发表情况和被引次数。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Sep 28;9(9):220440. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220440. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study.利用民主方式分配研究资金:一项观察性研究。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Sep 15;2:16. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0040-0. eCollection 2017.
3
Setting health research priorities using the CHNRI method: V. Quantitative properties of human collective knowledge.运用CHNRI方法确定卫生研究重点:五、人类集体知识的定量特性

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review.建模科学同行评审中主观和客观决策的影响。
Nature. 2014 Feb 6;506(7486):93-6. doi: 10.1038/nature12786. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
2
An experiment on prediction markets in science.科学中预测市场的实验。
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 30;4(12):e8500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008500.
3
Economics. The promise of prediction markets.经济学。预测市场的前景。
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010502. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.010502.
Science. 2008 May 16;320(5878):877-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1157679.