• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of aztreonam plus clindamycin with tobramycin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

作者信息

Birolini D, Moraes M F, de Souza O S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (Medical School of USP), Brazil.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1989;35 Suppl 1:49-57. doi: 10.1159/000238721.

DOI:10.1159/000238721
PMID:2659290
Abstract

The activity of aztreonam (a beta-lactam antibiotic with specific activity against gram-negative bacteria) was evaluated and compared with that of tobramycin in hospitalized patients with severe intra-abdominal infections due to gram-negative pathogens, either alone or in association with other bacteria. Of a total study population of 156 patients, 76 were assigned to treatment with aztreonam + clindamycin, and the remaining 80 were treated with tobramycin + clindamycin. Patients underwent a variety of surgical procedures involving the peritoneal cavity. The final clinical evaluation revealed similar percentages of satisfactory results: 86.8% for the patients in the aztreonam-treated group and 86.2% for the tobramycin-treated patients. Among the patients who had a poor therapeutic result, gram-negative bacteria, either alone or associated with gram-positive pathogens, were considered responsible for 50% of the infections in the aztreonam group; the percentage increased to 82% among those treated with tobramycin. The incidence of side effects and laboratory alterations was not significant and was similar in both groups. The results of this study suggest that aztreonam may be an effective and safe drug for the treatment of bacterial infections due to gram-negative pathogens.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of aztreonam plus clindamycin with tobramycin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Chemotherapy. 1989;35 Suppl 1:49-57. doi: 10.1159/000238721.
2
A comparative analysis of aztreonam + clindamycin versus tobramycin + clindamycin or amikacin + mezlocillin in the treatment of gram-negative lower respiratory tract infections.
Chemotherapy. 1989;35 Suppl 1:89-100. doi: 10.1159/000238726.
3
Aztreonam plus clindamycin vs. tobramycin plus clindamycin for the treatment of intraabdominal infections.氨曲南加克林霉素与妥布霉素加克林霉素治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7 Suppl 4:S724-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_4.s724.
4
Aztreonam plus clindamycin versus tobramycin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections.
Rev Infect Dis. 1991 May-Jun;13 Suppl 7:S629-33. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_7.s629.
5
Comparison of aztreonam and tobramycin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by gram-negative bacilli.
Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7 Suppl 4:S666-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_4.s666.
6
Treatment with aztreonam or tobramycin in critical care patients with nosocomial gram-negative pneumonia.
Am J Med. 1985 Feb 8;78(2A):34-41. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90201-3.
7
Overall clinical experience with aztreonam in the treatment of intraabdominal infections.氨曲南治疗腹腔内感染的总体临床经验。
Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;7 Suppl 4:S729-33. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_4.s729.
8
A randomized controlled trial of moxalactam versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of mixed anaerobic/aerobic infections.一项比较羟羧氧酰胺菌素与克林霉素/妥布霉素治疗需氧菌与厌氧菌混合感染的随机对照试验。
Am Surg. 1986 Sep;52(9):467-71.
9
Efficacy and safety of aztreonam-clindamycin versus tobramycin-clindamycin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli.氨曲南-克林霉素与妥布霉素-克林霉素治疗需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌引起的下呼吸道感染的疗效与安全性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Feb;27(2):246-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.27.2.246.
10
Results of a randomized, multicenter trial of meropenem versus clindamycin/tobramycin for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南与克林霉素/妥布霉素治疗腹腔内感染的随机多中心试验结果
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Feb;24 Suppl 2:S197-206. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_2.s197.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.成人胃肠道源性继发性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.
2
New developments and concepts in antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections.腹腔内感染抗菌治疗的新进展与新观念
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2000 Aug;2(4):277-82. doi: 10.1007/s11894-000-0019-7.
3
Piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗混合感染
Intensive Care Med. 1994 Jul;20 Suppl 3:S27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01745248.