Dehon Erin, Cruse Margaret H, Dawson Brandon, Jackson-Williams Loretta
University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Jackson, Mississippi.
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):927-30. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27010. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
Few studies have documented the value of mentoring for medical students, and research has been limited to more subjective (e.g., job satisfaction, perceived career preparation) rather than objective outcomes. This study examined whether having a mentor is associated with match outcome (where a student matched based on their rank order list [ROL]).
We sent a survey link to all emergency medicine (EM) program coordinators to distribute to their residents. EM residents were surveyed about whether they had a mentor during medical school. Match outcome was assessed by asking residents where they matched on their ROL (e.g., first choice, fifth choice). They were also asked about rank in medical school, type of degree (MD vs. DO), and performance on standardized tests. Residents who indicated having a mentor completed the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale (MES), which evaluates behavioral characteristics of the mentor and yields a total score. We assessed correlations among these variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Post-hoc analysis using independent sample t-test was conducted to compare differences in the MES score between those who matched to their first or second choice vs. third or higher choice.
Participants were a convenience sample of 297 EM residents. Of those, 199 (67%) reported having a mentor during medical school. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no significant correlation between having a mentor and match outcome (r=0.06, p=0.29). Match outcome was associated with class rank (r=0.13, p=0.03), satisfaction with match outcome (r= -0.37, p<0.001), and type of degree (r=0.12, p=0.04). Among those with mentors, a t-test revealed that the MES score was significantly higher among those who matched to their first or second choice (M=51.31, SD=10.13) compared to those who matched to their third or higher choice (M=43.59, SD=17.12), t(194)=3.65, p<0.001, d=0.55.
Simply having a mentor during medical school does not impact match outcome, but having an effective mentor is associated with a more favorable match outcome among medical students applying to EM programs.
很少有研究记录指导对医学生的价值,并且研究仅限于更主观的方面(例如工作满意度、感知到的职业准备情况),而非客观结果。本研究调查了拥有一位导师是否与匹配结果相关(即学生是否根据其排名顺序表[ROL]成功匹配)。
我们向所有急诊医学(EM)项目协调员发送了一个调查链接,以便他们分发给其住院医师。对EM住院医师进行调查,询问他们在医学院期间是否有导师。通过询问住院医师他们在ROL上的匹配位置(例如第一选择、第五选择)来评估匹配结果。还询问了他们在医学院的排名、学位类型(医学博士[MD]与医学博士[DO])以及标准化考试成绩。表示有导师的住院医师完成了导师效能量表(MES),该量表评估导师的行为特征并得出总分。我们使用Pearson相关系数评估这些变量之间的相关性。使用独立样本t检验进行事后分析,以比较匹配到第一或第二选择的人与匹配到第三或更高选择的人在MES得分上的差异。
参与者是297名EM住院医师的便利样本。其中,199人(67%)报告在医学院期间有导师。与我们的假设相反,拥有导师与匹配结果之间没有显著相关性(r = 0.06,p = 0.29)。匹配结果与班级排名(r = 0.13,p = 0.03)、对匹配结果的满意度(r = -0.37,p < 0.001)以及学位类型(r = 0.12,p = 0.04)相关。在有导师的人中,t检验显示,与匹配到第三或更高选择的人(M = 43.59,SD = 17.12)相比,匹配到第一或第二选择的人的MES得分显著更高(M = 51.31,SD = 10.13),t(194) = 3.65,p < 0.001,d = 0.55。
在医学院期间仅仅有一位导师并不会影响匹配结果,但拥有一位有效的导师与申请EM项目的医学生获得更有利的匹配结果相关。