Wise Michelle R, Shapiro Heather, Bodley Janet, Pittini Richard, McKay Darren, Willan Andrew, Hannah Mary E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Feb;26(2):127-36. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30488-1.
(1) To determine if women faculty members in departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology were less likely than men to achieve promotion; and (2) to assess gender differences in attitudes towards promotion.
Department chairs at the 16 medical schools in Canada were approached to participate in this study. A questionnaire was mailed to the obstetricians/gynaecologists in faculties of medicine at the 15 Canadian medical schools that agreed to participate. Likelihood of promotion for women and men was compared using survival analysis, controlling for other factors. Survival (event) time was the time in years between completion of residency and achieving promotion.
The response rate was 72% (376/522). Overall, 37% of respondents were women, and 63% were men. The women respondents were younger than the men, with a mean age of 43.4 +/- 7.9 years compared to 52.8 +/- 8.9 years. Of those in an academic stream, 39% of women (29/75) and 62% of men (90/145) had attained senior academic ranks. Completing residency more recently was associated with a higher likelihood of promotion to Assistant Professor (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; P <0.001). The likelihood of promotion to Professor was lower for women than for men (HR, 0.40; P = 0.05). Having a mentor was associated with a higher likelihood of promotion to Professor (HR, 2.33; P = 0.002). Women were more likely to perceive barriers to promotion, such as family care responsibilities (P <0.001).
Independent of the respondent's gender, recent completion of residency and having a mentor were the most significant factors increasing the likelihood of promotion in Canadian medical school departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. As women were found to be less likely than men to achieve promotion to Professor, mentoring and strategies that focus on facilitating promotion for women should be encouraged to ensure there are academic leaders in obstetrics and gynaecology in the future.
(1)确定妇产科系女教员晋升的可能性是否低于男教员;(2)评估晋升态度方面的性别差异。
联系了加拿大16所医学院校的系主任参与本研究。向同意参与的15所加拿大医学院校的医学院妇产科医生邮寄了一份问卷。使用生存分析比较男女晋升的可能性,并控制其他因素。生存(事件)时间是住院医师培训结束至获得晋升之间的年数。
回复率为72%(376/522)。总体而言,37%的受访者为女性,63%为男性。女性受访者比男性年轻,平均年龄为43.4±7.9岁,而男性为52.8±8.9岁。在学术领域,39%的女性(29/75)和62%的男性(90/145)获得了高级学术职称。近期完成住院医师培训与晋升为助理教授的可能性较高相关(风险比[HR],1.05;P<0.001)。女性晋升为教授的可能性低于男性(HR,0.40;P = 0.05)。有导师与晋升为教授的可能性较高相关(HR,2.33;P = 0.002)。女性更有可能察觉到晋升障碍,如家庭照顾责任(P<0.001)。
在加拿大医学院校的妇产科系,无论受访者性别如何,近期完成住院医师培训和有导师是增加晋升可能性的最重要因素。由于发现女性晋升为教授的可能性低于男性,应鼓励开展指导以及注重促进女性晋升的策略,以确保未来妇产科领域有学术带头人。