Gaussian Inc. , 340 Quinnipiac St., Bldg. 40, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492-4050, United States.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Oct 11;7(10):3323-34. doi: 10.1021/ct200507e. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
We present a systematic study of the basis set dependence of the backscattering vibrational Raman intensities and Raman Optical Activity (ROA) intensity differences. The accuracies of computed Raman intensities and ROA intensity differences for a series of commonly used basis sets are reported, relative to large reference basis sets, using the B3LYP density functional. This study attempts to separately quantify the relative accuracies obtained from particular basis set combinations: one for the geometry optimization and force field computation and the other for the computation of Raman and ROA tensors. We demonstrate here that the basis set requirements for the geometry and force fields are not similar to those of the Raman and ROA tensors. The Raman and ROA tensors require basis sets with diffuse functions, while geometry optimizations and force field computations typically do not. Eleven molecules were examined: (S)-methyloxirane, (S)-methylthirane, (R)-epichlorhydrin, (S)-CHFClBr, (1S,5S)-α-pinene, (1S,5S)-β-pinene, (1S,4S)-norborneneone, (M)-σ-[4]-helicene, an enone precursor to a cytotoxic sesquiterpene, the gauche-gauche conformer of the monosaccharide methyl-β-d-glucopyranose, and the dipeptide Ac-(alanine)2-NH2. For the molecules examined here, intensities and intensity differences obtained from Raman and ROA tensors computed using the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set are nearly equivalent to those computed with the larger aug-cc-pVTZ basis set. We find that modifying the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set by removing the set of diffuse d functions on all atoms (while keeping the diffuse s and p sets), denoted as aug(sp)-cc-pVDZ, results in a basis set which is significantly faster without much reduction in the overall accuracy. In addition, the popular rDPS basis set introduced by Zuber and Hug offers a good compromise between accuracy and efficiency. The combination of either the aug(sp)-pVDZ or rDPS basis for the computation of the Raman and ROA tensors with the 6-31G* basis set for the geometry optimization and force field calculation is a reliable and cost-effective method for obtaining Raman intensities and ROA intensity differences.
我们对反散射振动拉曼强度和拉曼光学活性(ROA)强度差的基组依赖性进行了系统研究。报告了使用 B3LYP 密度泛函相对于大参考基组计算的一系列常用基组的计算拉曼强度和 ROA 强度差的准确性,分别量化了从特定基组组合获得的相对准确性:一个用于几何优化和力场计算,另一个用于计算拉曼和 ROA 张量。我们在这里证明,用于几何形状和力场的基组要求与拉曼和 ROA 张量的要求不相似。拉曼和 ROA 张量需要具有弥散函数的基组,而几何优化和力场计算通常不需要。检查了 11 个分子:(S)-氧化甲基,(S)-甲基噻烷,(R)-环氧氯丙烷,(S)-CHFClBr,(1S,5S)-α-蒎烯,(1S,5S)-β-蒎烯,(1S,4S)-降冰片烯酮,(M)-σ-[4]-螺旋烯,一种细胞毒性倍半萜烯的烯酮前体,单糖甲基-β-d-吡喃葡萄糖的 gauche-gauche 构象,和二肽 Ac-(丙氨酸)2-NH2。对于这里检查的分子,使用 aug-cc-pVDZ 基组计算的拉曼和 ROA 张量获得的强度和强度差与使用较大的 aug-cc-pVTZ 基组计算的强度和强度差几乎相同。我们发现,通过从所有原子上去除弥散 d 函数集(同时保留弥散 s 和 p 集)来修改 aug-cc-pVDZ 基组,得到的基组速度显著提高,而整体准确性没有太大降低。此外,由 Zuber 和 Hug 引入的流行 rDPS 基组在准确性和效率之间提供了一个很好的折衷。对于计算拉曼和 ROA 张量,使用 aug(sp)-cc-pVDZ 或 rDPS 基组,对于几何优化和力场计算,使用 6-31G*基组,是获得拉曼强度和 ROA 强度差的可靠且经济有效的方法。