Galliano D, Cardesi E, Gandolfo S, Gatto V
Minerva Stomatol. 1989 Apr;38(4):481-7.
A series of 24 white mouth lesions variously diagnosed as leukoplakia, lichen planus and discord lupus erythematosus is examined. A number of histological parameters were investigated using samples stained with haematoxylin-eosin and orcein and by Wohlgemulh's test. The 24 cases were also assessed by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) using the standard techniques. The aim of the study was to discover which of the histological and DIF findings were most helpful for diagnosis. The results confirm the view that histological diagnosis is only possible in some cases and that DIF helps to clarify histologically uncertain ones. Even so, clinical examination of the patient remains essential in order to eliminate the uncertainty created by the histological findings. It therefore follows that close collaboration between clinician and pathologist is essential.
对一系列24例被诊断为白斑、扁平苔藓和盘状红斑狼疮的口腔白色病变进行了检查。使用苏木精-伊红和地衣红染色的样本以及通过沃尔格穆尔试验研究了一些组织学参数。还采用标准技术通过直接免疫荧光(DIF)对这24例病例进行了评估。该研究的目的是发现哪些组织学和DIF结果对诊断最有帮助。结果证实了以下观点:组织学诊断仅在某些情况下可行,而DIF有助于澄清组织学上不确定的病例。即便如此,对患者进行临床检查仍然至关重要,以便消除组织学结果所带来的不确定性。因此,临床医生和病理学家之间的密切合作至关重要。