• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期再次剖宫产与既往剖宫产术后试产的比较:倾向评分分析

Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis.

作者信息

Kok N, Ruiter L, Lindeboom R, de Groot C, Pajkrt E, Mol B W, Kazemier B M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:214-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.011
PMID:26599733
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine neonatal and short term maternal outcomes according to intentional mode of delivery following a cesarean delivery (CD).

STUDY DESIGN

Women pregnant after CD between January 2000 and December 2007 were categorized according to whether they had an elective repeat CD (ERCD) or a Trial of Labor (TOL). Prognostically equal ERCD and TOL groups were created using the propensity score matching technique. Conditional logistic regression was performed to assess differences in neonatal and maternal outcomes.

POPULATION

Women in their second ongoing pregnancy with a history of CD.

RESULTS

After ERCD the rates of low 5min Apgar score (OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.2-0.5, p<0.001), meconium aspiration (OR 0.0, 95%CI 0-0.7, p=0.02) and birth trauma (OR 0.08, 95%CI 0.002-0.5, p<0.001) were lower compared to TOL. The rate of transient tachypnoea of the newborn (TTN) appears higher in the ERCD group (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0-2.8, p=0.04). Uterine rupture (OR 0.1, 95%CI 0.003-0.8, p=0.02) and hemorrhage (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.5-0.8, p<0.001) occurred less in the ERCD group.

CONCLUSION

Neonatal and short term maternal morbidity appears to be lower after ERCD than after TOL. Only TTN was seen more often after ERCD.

摘要

目的

根据剖宫产术后的分娩方式确定新生儿及产妇短期结局。

研究设计

将2000年1月至2007年12月剖宫产术后再次妊娠的女性,根据她们是进行择期再次剖宫产(ERCD)还是尝试经阴道分娩(TOL)进行分类。采用倾向评分匹配技术创建预后相当的ERCD组和TOL组。进行条件逻辑回归以评估新生儿和产妇结局的差异。

研究对象

有剖宫产史的第二次妊娠女性。

结果

与TOL相比,ERCD后5分钟Apgar评分低(OR 0.3,95%CI 0.2 - 0.5,p<0.001)、胎粪吸入(OR 0.0,95%CI 0 - 0.7,p = 0.02)和产伤(OR 0.08,95%CI 0.002 - 0.5,p<0.001)的发生率较低。ERCD组新生儿短暂性呼吸急促(TTN)的发生率似乎更高(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.0 - 2.8,p = 0.04)。ERCD组子宫破裂(OR 0.1,95%CI 0.003 - 0.8,p = 0.02)和出血(OR 0.6,95%CI 0.5 - 0.8,p<0.001)的发生率较低。

结论

ERCD后新生儿及产妇短期发病率似乎低于TOL。仅ERCD后TTN更常见。

相似文献

1
Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis.择期再次剖宫产与既往剖宫产术后试产的比较:倾向评分分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:214-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
2
Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis.择期再次剖宫产与前次剖宫产产后自发试产的比较:倾向评分分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):311.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.002.
3
Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:新见解
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010 Mar(191):1-397.
4
[Benefits and harms to the newborn of maternal attempt at trial of labor after prior caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery].[既往剖宫产术后产妇试产与择期再次剖宫产对新生儿的利弊]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Dec;41(8):727-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.034. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
5
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).有剖宫产史产妇的分娩:法国妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
6
Morbidity of Repeat Cesarean Delivery after a Trial of Labor as Compared with Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.试产失败后的再次剖宫产与选择性再次剖宫产的发病率比较。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2582-e2586. doi: 10.1055/a-2126-7613. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
7
The Feasibility of a Trial of Labor after Two Cesarean Deliveries: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Success.两次剖宫产术后试产的可行性:成功的结局和预测因素。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2636-e2644. doi: 10.1055/a-2135-6962. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
The impact of a trial of labor after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis.剖宫产术后试产与选择性重复剖宫产分娩的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 16;103(7):e37156. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037156.
9
Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery.与再次剖宫产相比,对于没有其他风险因素的产妇,行试产。这些产妇的唯一风险因素是曾行剖宫产。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Nov;92(11):1256-63. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12240.
10
[Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery].[经产妇阴道试产与择期再次剖宫产的母体获益与风险]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Dec;41(8):708-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.028. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section and risk of undergoing pelvic floor surgery: A Scottish population-based record linkage cohort study.既往剖宫产术后计划分娩方式与盆底手术风险:一项苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Nov 22;19(11):e1004119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004119. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section: A structured review of the evidence on the associated outcomes for women and their children in high-income setting.既往剖宫产术后的计划分娩方式:对高收入环境下女性及其子女相关结局证据的结构化综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 6;9:920647. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.920647. eCollection 2022.
3
Feeding Practices, Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Vaginal Birth after Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.
剖宫产术后及选择性重复剖宫产阴道分娩的喂养方式、母婴结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7696. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137696.
4
Correlation Between Previous Caesarean Section and Adverse Maternal Outcomes Accordingly With Robson Classification: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.根据罗布森分类法分析既往剖宫产与不良孕产妇结局的相关性:系统评价与Meta分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 10;8:740000. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.740000. eCollection 2021.
5
Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.既往剖宫产术后计划性分娩方式与近期母婴围生结局的关系:苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 24;16(9):e1002913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002913. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Caesarean sections and the prevalence of preterm and early-term births in Brazil: secondary analyses of national birth registration.巴西的剖宫产以及早产和早期足月产的患病率:国家出生登记的二次分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 5;8(8):e021538. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021538.